APOG vs CRH
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. and CRH Public Ltd. Co., side by side — 5 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | APOG | CRH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $37.4B |
| Net income | $54.1M | $3.8B |
| Gross margin | 22.7% | 36.1% |
| Net margin | 3.9% | 10.1% |
| Return on equity | 10.8% | 16.5% |
| Diluted EPS | $2.52 | $5.51 |
| Dividend / share | $1.05 | $1.48 |
| Payout ratio | 41.0% | · |
| Free cash flow | $95.2M | $2.9B |
| Equity | $511.8M | $24.0B |
| Net debt / equity | 0.38× | 0.56× |
| Current ratio | 1.65× | 1.74× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 2.7% | · |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 28.5% | · |
CRH bills 26.7× the revenue of APOG, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (10.1% against 3.9%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
5 years side by side
| Fiscal year | APOG | CRH |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $1.4B | $37.4B |
| FY2024 | $1.4B | $35.6B |
| FY2023 | $1.4B | $34.9B |
| FY2022 | $1.4B | $32.7B |
| FY2021 | $1.3B | $29.2B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | APOG | CRH |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $54.1M | $3.8B |
| FY2024 | $85.1M | $3.5B |
| FY2023 | $99.6M | $3.2B |
| FY2022 | $104.1M | $3.9B |
| FY2021 | $3.5M | $2.6B |
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$36,042,267,000 | CRH |
| FY2024 | −$34,211,006,000 | CRH |
| FY2023 | −$33,532,058,000 | CRH |
| FY2022 | −$31,282,304,000 | CRH |
| FY2021 | −$27,892,023,000 | CRH |
CRH has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 5 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
5 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −6.3 pp | CRH |
| FY2024 | −3.6 pp | CRH |
| FY2023 | −1.8 pp | CRH |
| FY2022 | −4.7 pp | CRH |
| FY2021 | −8.9 pp | CRH |
CRH has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 5 fiscal years.
5 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
APOG's net margin has been more volatile than CRH's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 2.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.1.
5 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
CRH led in net margin in every one of the 5 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
5 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
APOG's return on equity has been more volatile than CRH's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 9.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.9.
5 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between APOG and CRH over these 5 fiscal years — APOG led in 3 and CRH in 2.
5 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.