APOG vs CX
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. and Cemex SAB de CV, side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | APOG | CX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $16.2B |
| Net income | $54.1M | $939.0M |
| Gross margin | 22.7% | 33.6% |
| Net margin | 3.9% | 5.9% |
| Return on equity | 10.8% | 7.8% |
| Diluted EPS | $2.52 | $0.02 |
| Dividend / share | $1.05 | · |
| Payout ratio | 41.0% | 9.6% |
| Free cash flow | $95.2M | $894.0M |
| Equity | $511.8M | $12.2B |
| Net debt / equity | 0.38× | 0.38× |
| Current ratio | 1.65× | 0.82× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 2.7% | 4.6% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 28.5% | 45.7% |
CX bills 11.5× the revenue of APOG, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (5.9% against 3.9%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | APOG | CX |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | $1.4B | $16.2B |
| FY2023 | $1.4B | $16.6B |
| FY2022 | $1.4B | $14.7B |
| FY2021 | $1.3B | $14.4B |
| FY2020 | $1.2B | $12.7B |
| FY2019 | $1.4B | $13.0B |
| FY2018 | $1.4B | $13.5B |
| FY2017 | $1.3B | $12.9B |
| FY2016 | $1.1B | · |
| FY2015 | $981.2M | · |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | APOG | CX |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | $85.1M | $939.0M |
| FY2023 | $99.6M | $182.0M |
| FY2022 | $104.1M | $858.0M |
| FY2021 | $3.5M | $753.0M |
| FY2020 | $15.4M | $-1.5B |
| FY2019 | $61.9M | $143.0M |
| FY2018 | $45.7M | $528.0M |
| FY2017 | $79.5M | $792.0M |
| FY2016 | $85.8M | · |
| FY2015 | $65.3M | · |
8 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | −$14,839,006,000 | CX |
| FY2023 | −$15,137,058,000 | CX |
| FY2022 | −$13,265,304,000 | CX |
| FY2021 | −$13,065,023,000 | CX |
| FY2020 | −$11,438,226,000 | CX |
| FY2019 | −$11,571,561,000 | CX |
| FY2018 | −$12,128,363,000 | CX |
| FY2017 | −$11,599,827,000 | CX |
CX has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 8 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
8 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
10 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | +0.3 pp | APOG |
| FY2023 | +5.8 pp | APOG |
| FY2022 | +1.2 pp | APOG |
| FY2021 | −5.1 pp | CX |
| FY2020 | +12.7 pp | APOG |
| FY2019 | +3.1 pp | APOG |
| FY2018 | −1.0 pp | CX |
| FY2017 | −0.7 pp | CX |
| FY2016 | +1.6 pp | APOG |
| FY2015 | +5.7 pp | APOG |
The higher net margin has changed hands between APOG and CX over this period.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CX's net margin has been more volatile than APOG's over the 10 comparable fiscal years — 5.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.5.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between APOG and CX over these 10 fiscal years — APOG led in 7 and CX in 3.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CX's return on equity has been more volatile than APOG's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 55.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 8.2.
9 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between APOG and CX over these 9 fiscal years — APOG led in 7 and CX in 2.
9 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.