Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / ARHS VS LOVE

ARHS vs LOVE

Arhaus, Inc. and Lovesac Co., side by side — 7 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

ARHS vs LOVE, at a glance
Metric ARHS LOVE
Revenue$1.4B$697.1M
Net income$67.3M$4.1M
Gross margin38.9%56.4%
Net margin4.9%0.6%
Return on equity17.7%1.9%
Diluted EPS$0.48$0.28
Dividend / share··
Payout ratio0.5%·
Free cash flow$59.0M$26.2M
Equity$418.2M$218.7M
Net debt / equity··
Current ratio1.37×1.61×
Revenue CAGR 5y22.1%16.8%
Profit CAGR 5y61.7%−22.7%

ARHS bills 2.0× the revenue of LOVE, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (4.9% against 0.6%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

7 years side by side

ARHS vs LOVE, revenue by year
Fiscal year ARHS LOVE
FY2025$1.4B$697.1M
FY2024$1.3B$680.6M
FY2023$1.3B$700.3M
FY2022$1.2B$651.2M
FY2021$796.9M$498.2M
FY2020$507.4M$320.7M
FY2019$494.5M$233.4M
Net income by year

Bottom line

ARHS vs LOVE, net income by year
Fiscal year ARHS LOVE
FY2025$67.3M$4.1M
FY2024$68.5M$11.6M
FY2023$125.2M$23.9M
FY2022$136.6M$26.5M
FY2021$36.9M$47.5M
FY2020$6.1M$14.7M
FY2019$7.5M$-15.2M
Revenue gap over time

7 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$682,107,000ARHS
FY2024+$590,479,000ARHS
FY2023+$587,439,000ARHS
FY2022+$577,749,000ARHS
FY2021+$298,683,000ARHS
FY2020+$186,691,000ARHS
FY2019+$261,161,000ARHS

ARHS has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 7 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

7 of 9 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

7 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+4.3 ppARHS
FY2024+3.7 ppARHS
FY2023+6.3 ppARHS
FY2022+7.1 ppARHS
FY2021−4.9 ppLOVE
FY2020−1.2 ppLOVE
FY2019+9.7 ppARHS

The higher net margin has changed hands between ARHS and LOVE over this period.

7 of 9 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

LOVE's net margin has been more volatile than ARHS's over the 7 comparable fiscal years — 4.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.9.

7 of 9 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between ARHS and LOVE over these 7 fiscal years — ARHS led in 5 and LOVE in 2.

7 of 9 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

ARHS's return on equity has been more volatile than LOVE's over the 4 comparable fiscal years — 32.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.2.

4 of 9 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

ARHS led in return on equity in every one of the 4 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

4 of 9 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages