ARMK vs CMG
Aramark and Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | ARMK | CMG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.5B | $11.9B |
| Net income | $326.4M | $1.5B |
| Gross margin | 8.4% | · |
| Net margin | 1.8% | 12.9% |
| Return on equity | 10.6% | 47.4% |
| Diluted EPS | $1.22 | $1.14 |
| Dividend / share | $0.42 | · |
| Payout ratio | 34.0% | · |
| Free cash flow | $431.8M | $1.4B |
| Equity | $3.1B | $2.8B |
| Net debt / equity | 1.50× | −0.12× |
| Current ratio | 0.99× | 1.23× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 7.6% | 14.8% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | 34.0% |
ARMK bills 1.6× the revenue of CMG, and CMG keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (12.9% against 1.8%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | ARMK | CMG |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $18.5B | $11.9B |
| FY2024 | $17.4B | $11.3B |
| FY2023 | $16.1B | $9.9B |
| FY2022 | $13.7B | $8.6B |
| FY2021 | $12.1B | $7.5B |
| FY2020 | $12.8B | $6.0B |
| FY2019 | $16.2B | $5.6B |
| FY2018 | $15.8B | $4.9B |
| FY2017 | $14.6B | $4.5B |
| FY2016 | $14.4B | $3.9B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | ARMK | CMG |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $326.4M | $1.5B |
| FY2024 | $262.5M | $1.5B |
| FY2023 | $674.1M | $1.2B |
| FY2022 | $194.5M | $899.1M |
| FY2021 | $-90.8M | $653.0M |
| FY2020 | $-461.5M | $355.8M |
| FY2019 | $448.5M | $350.2M |
| FY2018 | $567.9M | $176.6M |
| FY2017 | $373.9M | $176.3M |
| FY2016 | $287.8M | $22.9M |
10 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$6,580,698,000 | ARMK |
| FY2024 | +$6,086,848,000 | ARMK |
| FY2023 | +$6,211,563,000 | ARMK |
| FY2022 | +$5,052,617,000 | ARMK |
| FY2021 | +$4,548,904,000 | ARMK |
| FY2020 | +$6,844,925,000 | ARMK |
| FY2019 | +$10,640,972,000 | ARMK |
| FY2018 | +$10,924,648,000 | ARMK |
| FY2017 | +$10,128,000,000 | ARMK |
| FY2016 | +$10,511,445,000 | ARMK |
ARMK has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 10 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
10 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
10 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −11.1 pp | CMG |
| FY2024 | −12.1 pp | CMG |
| FY2023 | −8.3 pp | CMG |
| FY2022 | −9.0 pp | CMG |
| FY2021 | −9.4 pp | CMG |
| FY2020 | −9.5 pp | CMG |
| FY2019 | −3.5 pp | CMG |
| FY2018 | −0.0 pp | CMG |
| FY2017 | −1.4 pp | CMG |
| FY2016 | +1.4 pp | ARMK |
The higher net margin has changed hands between ARMK and CMG over this period.
10 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CMG's net margin has been more volatile than ARMK's over the 10 comparable fiscal years — 4.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.1.
10 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between ARMK and CMG over these 10 fiscal years — ARMK led in 1 and CMG in 9.
10 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CMG's return on equity has been more volatile than ARMK's over the 14 comparable fiscal years — 13.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 9.0.
14 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between ARMK and CMG over these 14 fiscal years — ARMK led in 3 and CMG in 11.
14 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.