ARMK vs QSR
Aramark and Restaurant Brands International Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | ARMK | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.5B | $9.4B |
| Net income | $326.4M | $1.1B |
| Gross margin | 8.4% | · |
| Net margin | 1.8% | 11.4% |
| Return on equity | 10.6% | · |
| Diluted EPS | $1.22 | $2.35 |
| Dividend / share | $0.42 | $2.48 |
| Payout ratio | 34.0% | · |
| Free cash flow | $431.8M | $1.4B |
| Equity | $3.1B | $3.6B |
| Net debt / equity | 1.50× | 3.33× |
| Current ratio | 0.99× | 0.98× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 7.6% | 13.7% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | 7.5% |
ARMK bills 2.0× the revenue of QSR, and QSR keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (11.4% against 1.8%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | ARMK | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $18.5B | $9.4B |
| FY2024 | $17.4B | $8.4B |
| FY2023 | $16.1B | $7.0B |
| FY2022 | $13.7B | $6.5B |
| FY2021 | $12.1B | $5.7B |
| FY2020 | $12.8B | $5.0B |
| FY2019 | $16.2B | $5.6B |
| FY2018 | $15.8B | $5.4B |
| FY2017 | $14.6B | $4.6B |
| FY2016 | $14.4B | $4.1B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | ARMK | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $326.4M | $1.1B |
| FY2024 | $262.5M | $1.4B |
| FY2023 | $674.1M | $1.7B |
| FY2022 | $194.5M | $1.5B |
| FY2021 | $-90.8M | $1.3B |
| FY2020 | $-461.5M | $750.0M |
| FY2019 | $448.5M | $1.1B |
| FY2018 | $567.9M | $1.1B |
| FY2017 | $373.9M | $1.2B |
| FY2016 | $287.8M | $956.0M |
14 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$9,072,299,000 | ARMK |
| FY2024 | +$8,994,701,000 | ARMK |
| FY2023 | +$9,061,212,000 | ARMK |
| FY2022 | +$7,182,269,000 | ARMK |
| FY2021 | +$6,356,965,000 | ARMK |
| FY2020 | +$7,861,559,000 | ARMK |
| FY2019 | +$10,624,341,000 | ARMK |
| FY2018 | +$10,432,633,000 | ARMK |
| FY2017 | +$10,028,412,000 | ARMK |
| FY2016 | +$10,269,829,000 | ARMK |
| FY2015 | +$10,276,935,000 | ARMK |
| FY2014 | +$13,634,113,000 | ARMK |
| FY2013 | +$12,799,357,000 | ARMK |
| FY2012 | +$11,534,526,000 | ARMK |
ARMK has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 14 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
14 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
14 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −9.6 pp | QSR |
| FY2024 | −15.7 pp | QSR |
| FY2023 | −20.3 pp | QSR |
| FY2022 | −21.4 pp | QSR |
| FY2021 | −22.6 pp | QSR |
| FY2020 | −18.7 pp | QSR |
| FY2019 | −17.1 pp | QSR |
| FY2018 | −17.8 pp | QSR |
| FY2017 | −24.4 pp | QSR |
| FY2016 | −21.1 pp | QSR |
| FY2015 | −11.0 pp | QSR |
| FY2014 | +23.5 pp | ARMK |
| FY2013 | −19.9 pp | QSR |
| FY2012 | −5.2 pp | QSR |
The higher net margin has changed hands between ARMK and QSR over this period.
14 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
QSR's net margin has been more volatile than ARMK's over the 14 comparable fiscal years — 11.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.8.
14 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between ARMK and QSR over these 14 fiscal years — ARMK led in 1 and QSR in 13.
14 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
QSR's return on equity has been more volatile than ARMK's over the 3 comparable fiscal years — 3.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.7.
3 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between ARMK and QSR over these 3 fiscal years — ARMK led in 2 and QSR in 1.
3 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.