Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / BAH VS TTEK

BAH vs TTEK

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. and Tetra Tech Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

BAH vs TTEK, at a glance
Metric BAH TTEK
Revenue$11.2B$5.4B
Net income$851.0M$247.9M
Gross margin52.7%17.7%
Net margin7.6%4.6%
Return on equity80.7%13.7%
Diluted EPS$6.90$0.93
Dividend / share$2.24$0.25
Payout ratio32.4%26.2%
Free cash flow$951.0M$439.1M
Equity$1.1B$1.8B
Net debt / equity2.91×0.33×
Current ratio1.78×1.18×
Revenue CAGR 5y7.4%12.7%
Profit CAGR 5y6.9%7.4%

BAH bills 2.1× the revenue of TTEK, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (7.6% against 4.6%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

BAH vs TTEK, revenue by year
Fiscal year BAH TTEK
FY2025$11.2B$5.4B
FY2024$12.0B$5.2B
FY2023$10.7B$4.5B
FY2022$9.3B$3.5B
FY2021$8.4B$3.2B
FY2020$7.9B$3.0B
FY2019$7.5B$3.1B
FY2018$6.7B$3.0B
FY2017$6.2B$2.8B
FY2016$5.8B$2.6B
Net income by year

Bottom line

BAH vs TTEK, net income by year
Fiscal year BAH TTEK
FY2025$851.0M$247.9M
FY2024$935.0M$333.4M
FY2023$606.0M$273.5M
FY2022$272.0M$263.2M
FY2021$466.7M$232.8M
FY2020$609.0M$173.9M
FY2019$482.6M$158.8M
FY2018$418.5M$137.0M
FY2017$301.7M$117.9M
FY2016$260.8M$83.9M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$5,774,410,000BAH
FY2024+$6,781,321,000BAH
FY2023+$6,139,450,000BAH
FY2022+$5,754,952,000BAH
FY2021+$5,150,187,000BAH
FY2020+$4,864,047,000BAH
FY2019+$4,356,493,000BAH
FY2018+$3,739,889,000BAH
FY2017+$3,414,240,000BAH
FY2016+$3,226,022,000BAH
FY2015+$3,106,417,000BAH
FY2014+$2,790,956,000BAH
FY2013+$2,864,938,000BAH
FY2012+$3,046,984,000BAH
FY2011+$3,286,074,000BAH
FY2010+$3,390,064,000BAH
FY2009+$2,835,149,000BAH

BAH has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+3.0 ppBAH
FY2024+1.4 ppBAH
FY2023−0.4 ppTTEK
FY2022−4.6 ppTTEK
FY2021−1.7 ppTTEK
FY2020+1.9 ppBAH
FY2019+1.4 ppBAH
FY2018+1.6 ppBAH
FY2017+0.6 ppBAH
FY2016+1.2 ppBAH
FY2015+3.7 ppBAH
FY2014+0.0 ppBAH
FY2013+4.3 ppBAH
FY2012−0.1 ppTTEK
FY2011+0.5 ppBAH
FY2010−2.0 ppTTEK
FY2009−3.3 ppTTEK

The higher net margin has changed hands between BAH and TTEK over this period.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

BAH's net margin has been more volatile than TTEK's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 2.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.8.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between BAH and TTEK over these 17 fiscal years — BAH led in 11 and TTEK in 6.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

BAH's return on equity has been more volatile than TTEK's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 34.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.7.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between BAH and TTEK over these 17 fiscal years — BAH led in 16 and TTEK in 1.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages