Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / BDX VS MMM

BDX vs MMM

Becton Dickinson & Co. and 3M Co., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

BDX vs MMM, at a glance
Metric BDX MMM
Revenue$21.8B$24.9B
Net income$1.7B$3.2B
Gross margin45.4%39.9%
Net margin7.7%13.1%
Return on equity6.5%76.1%
Diluted EPS$5.82$6.00
Dividend / share$4.16$2.92
Payout ratio71.3%48.1%
Free cash flow$2.7B$1.4B
Equity$25.4B$4.7B
Net debt / equity0.73×1.57×
Current ratio1.11×1.71×
Revenue CAGR 5y6.3%−5.0%
Profit CAGR 5y13.9%−9.8%

BDX and MMM book revenue within 15% of each other, and MMM keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (13.1% against 7.7%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

BDX vs MMM, revenue by year
Fiscal year BDX MMM
FY2025$21.8B$24.9B
FY2024$20.2B$24.6B
FY2023$19.4B$24.6B
FY2022$18.9B$26.2B
FY2021$19.1B$35.4B
FY2020$16.1B$32.2B
FY2019$17.3B$32.1B
FY2018$16.0B$32.8B
FY2017$12.1B$31.7B
FY2016$12.5B$30.1B
Net income by year

Bottom line

BDX vs MMM, net income by year
Fiscal year BDX MMM
FY2025$1.7B$3.2B
FY2024$1.7B$4.2B
FY2023$1.5B$-7.0B
FY2022$1.8B$5.8B
FY2021$2.1B$5.9B
FY2020$874.0M$5.4B
FY2019$1.2B$4.5B
FY2018$311.0M$5.3B
FY2017$1.1B$4.9B
FY2016$976.0M$5.0B
Revenue gap over time

19 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$3,108,000,000MMM
FY2024−$4,397,000,000MMM
FY2023−$5,238,000,000MMM
FY2022−$7,291,000,000MMM
FY2021−$16,224,000,000MMM
FY2020−$16,110,000,000MMM
FY2019−$14,846,000,000MMM
FY2018−$16,782,000,000MMM
FY2017−$19,564,000,000MMM
FY2016−$17,626,000,000MMM
FY2015−$19,992,000,000MMM
FY2014−$23,375,000,000MMM
FY2013−$22,817,000,000MMM
FY2012−$22,196,000,000MMM
FY2011−$22,027,000,000MMM
FY2010−$19,537,615,000MMM
FY2009−$16,136,278,000MMM
FY2008−$18,371,381,000MMM
FY2007−$18,179,165,000MMM

MMM has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 19 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

19 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−5.4 ppMMM
FY2024−8.6 ppMMM
FY2023+36.0 ppBDX
FY2022−12.7 ppMMM
FY2021−5.8 ppMMM
FY2020−11.5 ppMMM
FY2019−7.0 ppMMM
FY2018−14.4 ppMMM
FY2017−6.3 ppMMM
FY2016−9.0 ppMMM
FY2015−9.2 ppMMM
FY2014−1.7 ppMMM
FY2013+0.8 ppBDX
FY2012+0.1 ppBDX
FY2011+2.0 ppBDX
FY2010+2.9 ppBDX
FY2009+3.6 ppBDX
FY2008+2.4 ppBDX
FY2007−2.8 ppMMM

The higher net margin has changed hands between BDX and MMM over this period.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

MMM's net margin has been more volatile than BDX's over the 19 comparable fiscal years — 10.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.7.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between BDX and MMM over these 19 fiscal years — BDX led in 7 and MMM in 12.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

MMM's return on equity has been more volatile than BDX's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 31.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 9.0.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between BDX and MMM over these 18 fiscal years — BDX led in 2 and MMM in 16.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages