Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / BIIB VS GILD

BIIB vs GILD

Biogen Inc. and Gilead Sciences, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

BIIB vs GILD, at a glance
Metric BIIB GILD
Revenue$9.9B$29.4B
Net income$1.3B$8.5B
Gross margin75.7%78.8%
Net margin13.1%28.9%
Return on equity7.4%40.5%
Diluted EPS$8.79$6.78
Dividend / share·$3.16
Payout ratio·47.0%
Free cash flow$2.1B$9.5B
Equity·$22.7B
Net debt / equity0.18×0.77×
Current ratio2.68×1.55×
Revenue CAGR 5y−6.0%3.6%
Profit CAGR 5y−20.2%133.3%

GILD bills 3.0× the revenue of BIIB, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (28.9% against 13.1%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

BIIB vs GILD, revenue by year
Fiscal year BIIB GILD
FY2025$9.9B$29.4B
FY2024$9.7B$28.8B
FY2023$9.8B$27.1B
FY2022$10.2B$27.3B
FY2021$11.0B$27.3B
FY2020$13.4B$24.7B
FY2019$14.4B$22.4B
FY2018$13.5B$22.1B
FY2017$12.3B$26.1B
FY2016$11.4B$30.4B
Net income by year

Bottom line

BIIB vs GILD, net income by year
Fiscal year BIIB GILD
FY2025$1.3B$8.5B
FY2024$1.6B$480.0M
FY2023$1.2B$5.7B
FY2022$3.0B$4.6B
FY2021$1.6B$6.2B
FY2020$4.0B$123.0M
FY2019$5.9B$5.4B
FY2018$4.4B$5.5B
FY2017$2.5B$4.6B
FY2016$3.7B$13.5B
Revenue gap over time

19 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$19,552,400,000GILD
FY2024−$19,078,100,000GILD
FY2023−$17,280,400,000GILD
FY2022−$17,107,600,000GILD
FY2021−$16,323,300,000GILD
FY2020−$11,244,400,000GILD
FY2019−$8,071,100,000GILD
FY2018−$8,674,100,000GILD
FY2017−$13,833,100,000GILD
FY2016−$18,941,200,000GILD
FY2015−$21,875,200,000GILD
FY2014−$15,186,700,000GILD
FY2013−$4,269,800,000GILD
FY2012−$4,185,539,000GILD
FY2011−$3,336,751,000GILD
FY2010−$3,232,997,000GILD
FY2009−$2,634,035,000GILD
FY2008−$1,238,243,000GILD
FY2007−$1,058,428,000GILD

GILD has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 19 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

19 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−15.8 ppGILD
FY2024+15.2 ppBIIB
FY2023−8.9 ppGILD
FY2022+12.4 ppBIIB
FY2021−7.0 ppGILD
FY2020+29.8 ppBIIB
FY2019+17.1 ppBIIB
FY2018+8.6 ppBIIB
FY2017+4.0 ppBIIB
FY2016−12.1 ppGILD
FY2015−22.1 ppGILD
FY2014−18.1 ppGILD
FY2013−0.4 ppGILD
FY2012−1.5 ppGILD
FY2011−8.2 ppGILD
FY2010−17.3 ppGILD
FY2009−15.1 ppGILD
FY2008−17.6 ppGILD
FY2007−19.0 ppGILD

The higher net margin has changed hands between BIIB and GILD over this period.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

GILD's net margin has been more volatile than BIIB's over the 19 comparable fiscal years — 13.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.7.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between BIIB and GILD over these 19 fiscal years — BIIB led in 6 and GILD in 13.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

GILD's return on equity has been more volatile than BIIB's over the 19 comparable fiscal years — 25.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 10.4.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between BIIB and GILD over these 19 fiscal years — BIIB led in 5 and GILD in 14.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages