Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / BIIB VS QGEN

BIIB vs QGEN

Biogen Inc. and Qiagen N.v., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

BIIB vs QGEN, at a glance
Metric BIIB QGEN
Revenue$9.9B$2.1B
Net income$1.3B$424.9M
Gross margin75.7%62.2%
Net margin13.1%20.3%
Return on equity7.4%11.6%
Diluted EPS$8.79$1.94
Dividend / share·$0.25
Payout ratio·12.8%
Free cash flow$2.1B$453.3M
Equity·$3.8B
Net debt / equity0.18×0.22×
Current ratio2.68×3.90×
Revenue CAGR 5y−6.0%2.2%
Profit CAGR 5y−20.2%3.4%

BIIB bills 4.7× the revenue of QGEN, and QGEN keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (20.3% against 13.1%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

BIIB vs QGEN, revenue by year
Fiscal year BIIB QGEN
FY2025$9.9B$2.1B
FY2024$9.7B$2.0B
FY2023$9.8B$2.0B
FY2022$10.2B$2.1B
FY2021$11.0B$2.3B
FY2020$13.4B$1.9B
FY2019$14.4B$1.5B
FY2018$13.5B$1.5B
FY2017$12.3B$1.4B
FY2016$11.4B$1.3B
Net income by year

Bottom line

BIIB vs QGEN, net income by year
Fiscal year BIIB QGEN
FY2025$1.3B$424.9M
FY2024$1.6B$83.6M
FY2023$1.2B$341.3M
FY2022$3.0B$423.2M
FY2021$1.6B$512.6M
FY2020$4.0B$359.2M
FY2019$5.9B$-41.5M
FY2018$4.4B$190.4M
FY2017$2.5B$40.4M
FY2016$3.7B$80.4M
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$7,800,601,000BIIB
FY2024+$7,697,686,000BIIB
FY2023+$7,870,289,000BIIB
FY2022+$8,031,882,000BIIB
FY2021+$8,730,043,000BIIB
FY2020+$11,574,254,000BIIB
FY2019+$12,851,476,000BIIB
FY2018+$11,951,052,000BIIB
FY2017+$10,856,364,000BIIB
FY2016+$10,110,809,000BIIB
FY2015+$9,482,814,000BIIB
FY2014+$8,358,523,000BIIB
FY2013+$5,630,216,000BIIB
FY2012+$4,262,005,000BIIB
FY2011+$3,878,887,000BIIB
FY2010+$3,628,992,000BIIB
FY2009+$3,367,523,000BIIB
FY2008+$3,204,532,000BIIB

BIIB has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 18 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−7.3 ppQGEN
FY2024+12.6 ppBIIB
FY2023−5.6 ppQGEN
FY2022+9.3 ppBIIB
FY2021−7.0 ppQGEN
FY2020+11.0 ppBIIB
FY2019+43.7 ppBIIB
FY2018+20.6 ppBIIB
FY2017+18.9 ppBIIB
FY2016+26.3 ppBIIB
FY2015+23.2 ppBIIB
FY2014+21.6 ppBIIB
FY2013+21.6 ppBIIB
FY2012+14.7 ppBIIB
FY2011+17.0 ppBIIB
FY2010+5.8 ppBIIB
FY2009+8.7 ppBIIB
FY2008+9.3 ppBIIB

The higher net margin has changed hands between BIIB and QGEN over this period.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

BIIB's net margin has been more volatile than QGEN's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 7.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 6.7.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between BIIB and QGEN over these 18 fiscal years — BIIB led in 15 and QGEN in 3.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

BIIB's return on equity has been more volatile than QGEN's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 10.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.7.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between BIIB and QGEN over these 18 fiscal years — BIIB led in 15 and QGEN in 3.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages