BN vs ZDPY
Brookfield Corp. and Zoned Properties, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | BN | ZDPY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.1B | $4.1M |
| Net income | $1.3B | $-2.9M |
| Gross margin | 62.2% | · |
| Net margin | 4.3% | −68.9% |
| Return on equity | 0.8% | −63.9% |
| Diluted EPS | $0.49 | −$0.24 |
| Dividend / share | $0.24 | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | $-3.8B | · |
| Equity | · | $3.1M |
| Net debt / equity | −0.01× | 2.23× |
| Current ratio | · | · |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 3.7% | 27.8% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
BN bills 18138.1× the revenue of ZDPY, and ZDPY closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | BN | ZDPY |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $75.1B | $4.1M |
| FY2024 | $86.0B | $3.8M |
| FY2023 | $95.9B | $2.9M |
| FY2022 | $92.8B | $2.7M |
| FY2021 | $75.7B | $1.8M |
| FY2020 | $62.8B | $1.2M |
| FY2019 | $67.8B | $1.3M |
| FY2018 | $56.8B | $1.2M |
| FY2017 | $40.8B | $2.1M |
| FY2016 | $24.4B | $1.9M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | BN | ZDPY |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $1.3B | $-2.9M |
| FY2024 | $641.0M | $573,958 |
| FY2023 | $1.1B | $-540,258 |
| FY2022 | $2.1B | $-574,355 |
| FY2021 | $4.0B | $-165,819 |
| FY2020 | $-134.0M | $-78,338 |
| FY2019 | $2.8B | $-12,281 |
| FY2018 | $3.6B | $-2.0M |
| FY2017 | $1.5B | $1.4M |
| FY2016 | $1.7B | $-501,576 |
10 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$75,095,859,542 | BN |
| FY2024 | +$86,002,206,711 | BN |
| FY2023 | +$95,921,113,009 | BN |
| FY2022 | +$92,766,339,910 | BN |
| FY2021 | +$75,729,179,515 | BN |
| FY2020 | +$62,750,784,558 | BN |
| FY2019 | +$67,824,739,579 | BN |
| FY2018 | +$56,769,763,070 | BN |
| FY2017 | +$40,783,886,136 | BN |
| FY2016 | +$24,409,146,292 | BN |
BN has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 10 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
10 of 13 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
10 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +73.2 pp | BN |
| FY2024 | −13.0 pp | ZDPY |
| FY2023 | +24.0 pp | BN |
| FY2022 | +27.2 pp | BN |
| FY2021 | +25.5 pp | BN |
| FY2020 | +7.6 pp | BN |
| FY2019 | +8.9 pp | BN |
| FY2018 | +177.1 pp | BN |
| FY2017 | −54.0 pp | ZDPY |
| FY2016 | +40.7 pp | BN |
The higher net margin has changed hands between BN and ZDPY over this period.
10 of 13 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
ZDPY's net margin has been more volatile than BN's over the 10 comparable fiscal years — 56.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.0.
10 of 13 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between BN and ZDPY over these 10 fiscal years — BN led in 8 and ZDPY in 2.
10 of 13 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
ZDPY's return on equity has been more volatile than BN's over the 10 comparable fiscal years — 21.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.2.
10 of 13 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between BN and ZDPY over these 10 fiscal years — BN led in 8 and ZDPY in 2.
10 of 13 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.