Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CAL VS SHOO

CAL vs SHOO

Caleres Inc. and Steven Madden, Ltd., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CAL vs SHOO, at a glance
Metric CAL SHOO
Revenue$2.8B$2.5B
Net income$-6.7M$49.0M
Gross margin43.0%41.4%
Net margin−0.4%1.9%
Return on equity−1.1%5.7%
Diluted EPS−$0.21$0.63
Dividend / share$0.28$0.84
Payout ratio−141.2%124.4%
Free cash flow$39.4M$119.5M
Equity$601.9M$866.4M
Net debt / equity·0.14×
Current ratio1.02×1.90×
Revenue CAGR 5y5.4%16.1%
Profit CAGR 5y··

CAL and SHOO book revenue within 15% of each other, and CAL closed the last reported year at a loss.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

CAL vs SHOO, revenue by year
Fiscal year CAL SHOO
FY2025$2.8B$2.5B
FY2024$2.7B$2.3B
FY2023$2.8B$2.0B
FY2022$3.0B$2.1B
FY2021$2.8B$1.9B
FY2020$2.1B$1.2B
FY2019$2.9B$1.8B
FY2018$2.8B$1.7B
FY2017$2.8B$1.6B
FY2016$2.6B$1.4B
Net income by year

Bottom line

CAL vs SHOO, net income by year
Fiscal year CAL SHOO
FY2025$-6.7M$49.0M
FY2024$107.3M$175.9M
FY2023$171.4M$174.0M
FY2022$181.7M$217.2M
FY2021$137.0M$192.5M
FY2020$-439.1M$-18.3M
FY2019$62.8M$141.7M
FY2018$-5.4M$129.1M
FY2017$87.2M$117.9M
FY2016$65.7M$121.3M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$223,744,000CAL
FY2024+$439,756,000CAL
FY2023+$835,712,000CAL
FY2022+$846,129,000CAL
FY2021+$911,462,000CAL
FY2020+$915,256,000CAL
FY2019+$1,134,405,000CAL
FY2018+$1,157,112,000CAL
FY2017+$1,218,501,000CAL
FY2016+$1,179,837,000CAL
FY2015+$1,172,191,000CAL
FY2014+$1,236,758,000CAL
FY2013+$1,198,890,000CAL
FY2012+$1,250,724,000CAL
FY2011+$1,466,217,000CAL
FY2010+$1,868,673,000CAL
FY2009+$1,738,418,000CAL

CAL has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−2.3 ppSHOO
FY2024−3.8 ppSHOO
FY2023−2.7 ppSHOO
FY2022−4.2 ppSHOO
FY2021−5.3 ppSHOO
FY2020−19.2 ppSHOO
FY2019−5.8 ppSHOO
FY2018−8.0 ppSHOO
FY2017−4.5 ppSHOO
FY2016−6.1 ppSHOO
FY2015−4.9 ppSHOO
FY2014−5.2 ppSHOO
FY2013−8.6 ppSHOO
FY2012−8.6 ppSHOO
FY2011−9.0 ppSHOO
FY2010−10.4 ppSHOO
FY2009−9.5 ppSHOO

SHOO has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 17 fiscal years.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CAL's net margin has been more volatile than SHOO's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 5.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.2.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

SHOO led in net margin in every one of the 17 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CAL's return on equity has been more volatile than SHOO's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 32.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 6.8.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between CAL and SHOO over these 17 fiscal years — CAL led in 3 and SHOO in 14.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages