Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CCK VS PH

CCK vs PH

Crown Holdings, Inc. and Parker-Hannifin Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CCK vs PH, at a glance
Metric CCK PH
Revenue$12.4B$21.5B
Net income$738.0M$3.6B
Gross margin22.0%37.7%
Net margin7.1%17.0%
Return on equity25.6%25.1%
Diluted EPS$6.38$28.48
Dividend / share$1.04$7.40
Payout ratio16.3%25.7%
Free cash flow$1.1B$3.9B
Equity$3.0B$15.4B
Net debt / equity1.71×0.50×
Current ratio1.03×1.26×
Revenue CAGR 5y5.7%8.4%
Profit CAGR 5y5.0%·

PH bills 1.7× the revenue of CCK, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (17.0% against 7.1%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

CCK vs PH, revenue by year
Fiscal year CCK PH
FY2025$12.4B$21.5B
FY2024$11.8B$19.9B
FY2023$12.0B$19.9B
FY2022$12.9B$19.1B
FY2021$11.4B$15.9B
FY2020$9.4B$14.3B
FY2019$9.6B$13.7B
FY2018$11.2B$14.3B
FY2017$8.7B$14.3B
FY2016$8.3B$12.0B
Net income by year

Bottom line

CCK vs PH, net income by year
Fiscal year CCK PH
FY2025$738.0M$3.6B
FY2024$424.0M$3.5B
FY2023$450.0M$2.8B
FY2022$727.0M$2.1B
FY2021$-560.0M$1.3B
FY2020$579.0M$1.7B
FY2019$510.0M$1.2B
FY2018$439.0M$1.5B
FY2017$323.0M$1.1B
FY2016$496.0M$983.4M
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$9,134,000,000PH
FY2024−$8,049,000,000PH
FY2023−$7,920,000,000PH
FY2022−$6,122,000,000PH
FY2021−$4,467,608,000PH
FY2020−$4,955,640,000PH
FY2019−$4,136,520,000PH
FY2018−$3,169,324,000PH
FY2017−$5,604,392,000PH
FY2016−$3,745,312,000PH
FY2015−$2,598,753,000PH
FY2014−$3,614,744,000PH
FY2013−$4,559,971,000PH
FY2012−$4,545,704,000PH
FY2011−$12,753,942,000PH
FY2010−$4,404,870,000PH
FY2009−$2,055,166,000PH
FY2008−$2,004,015,000PH

PH has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 18 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−9.8 ppPH
FY2024−13.0 ppPH
FY2023−9.4 ppPH
FY2022−4.3 ppPH
FY2021−11.9 ppPH
FY2020−4.8 ppPH
FY2019−2.2 ppPH
FY2018−5.9 ppPH
FY2017−2.5 ppPH
FY2016−1.1 ppPH
FY2015−1.8 ppPH
FY2014−2.7 ppPH
FY2013−2.9 ppPH
FY2012+0.5 ppCCK
FY2011+92.2 ppCCK
FY2010−2.9 ppPH
FY2009+0.1 ppCCK
FY2008−1.0 ppPH

The higher net margin has changed hands between CCK and PH over this period.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CCK's net margin has been more volatile than PH's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 22.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.5.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between CCK and PH over these 18 fiscal years — CCK led in 3 and PH in 15.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CCK's return on equity has been more volatile than PH's over the 10 comparable fiscal years — 60.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.6.

10 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between CCK and PH over these 10 fiscal years — CCK led in 7 and PH in 3.

10 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages