CLF vs NEM
Cleveland-cliffs Inc. and Newmont Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | CLF | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.6B | $22.7B |
| Net income | $-1.5B | $7.1B |
| Gross margin | −4.6% | 64.3% |
| Net margin | −7.7% | 31.6% |
| Return on equity | −23.2% | 22.2% |
| Diluted EPS | −$2.91 | $6.39 |
| Dividend / share | · | $1.00 |
| Payout ratio | · | 15.6% |
| Free cash flow | $-1.0B | $7.3B |
| Equity | $6.1B | $33.9B |
| Net debt / equity | 1.18× | −0.07× |
| Current ratio | 1.95× | 2.29× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 28.3% | 14.5% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | 20.2% |
NEM bills 1.2× the revenue of CLF, and CLF closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | CLF | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $18.6B | $22.7B |
| FY2024 | $19.2B | $18.7B |
| FY2023 | $22.0B | $11.8B |
| FY2022 | $23.0B | $11.9B |
| FY2021 | $20.4B | $12.2B |
| FY2020 | $5.4B | $11.5B |
| FY2019 | $2.0B | $9.7B |
| FY2018 | $2.3B | $7.3B |
| FY2017 | $1.9B | $7.4B |
| FY2016 | $1.6B | $6.7B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | CLF | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-1.5B | $7.1B |
| FY2024 | $-760.0M | $3.3B |
| FY2023 | $385.0M | $-2.5B |
| FY2022 | $1.3B | $-429.0M |
| FY2021 | $3.0B | $1.2B |
| FY2020 | $-122.0M | $2.8B |
| FY2019 | $293.0M | $2.8B |
| FY2018 | $1.1B | $341.0M |
| FY2017 | $367.0M | $-114.0M |
| FY2016 | $174.1M | $-629.0M |
14 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$4,059,000,000 | NEM |
| FY2024 | +$503,000,000 | CLF |
| FY2023 | +$10,184,000,000 | CLF |
| FY2022 | +$11,074,000,000 | CLF |
| FY2021 | +$8,222,000,000 | CLF |
| FY2020 | −$6,143,000,000 | NEM |
| FY2019 | −$7,750,000,000 | NEM |
| FY2018 | −$4,921,000,000 | NEM |
| FY2017 | −$5,513,000,000 | NEM |
| FY2016 | −$5,125,500,000 | NEM |
| FY2015 | −$4,071,700,000 | NEM |
| FY2014 | −$3,445,800,000 | NEM |
| FY2013 | −$4,523,200,000 | NEM |
| FY2012 | −$4,091,300,000 | NEM |
The higher-revenue side has changed between CLF and NEM over this period. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
14 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
14 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −39.3 pp | NEM |
| FY2024 | −21.8 pp | NEM |
| FY2023 | +22.9 pp | CLF |
| FY2022 | +9.1 pp | CLF |
| FY2021 | +12.9 pp | CLF |
| FY2020 | −25.8 pp | NEM |
| FY2019 | −14.9 pp | NEM |
| FY2018 | +43.1 pp | CLF |
| FY2017 | +20.9 pp | CLF |
| FY2016 | +26.9 pp | CLF |
| FY2015 | −42.2 pp | NEM |
| FY2014 | −251.2 pp | NEM |
| FY2013 | +42.5 pp | CLF |
| FY2012 | −40.4 pp | NEM |
The higher net margin has changed hands between CLF and NEM over this period.
14 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CLF's net margin has been more volatile than NEM's over the 14 comparable fiscal years — 67.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 18.4.
14 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between CLF and NEM over these 14 fiscal years — CLF led in 7 and NEM in 7.
14 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CLF's return on equity has been more volatile than NEM's over the 13 comparable fiscal years — 31.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 12.0.
13 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between CLF and NEM over these 13 fiscal years — CLF led in 8 and NEM in 5.
13 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.