Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CPK VS RGCO

CPK vs RGCO

Chesapeake Utilities Corp. and RGC Resources Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CPK vs RGCO, at a glance
Metric CPK RGCO
Revenue$930.0M$95.3M
Net income$140.3M$13.3M
Gross margin··
Net margin15.1%13.9%
Return on equity9.4%12.0%
Diluted EPS$5.97$1.29
Dividend / share$2.69$0.83
Payout ratio43.3%63.8%
Free cash flow$-214.9M$8.2M
Equity$1.6B$113.6M
Net debt / equity0.91×1.29×
Current ratio0.45×1.03×
Revenue CAGR 5y13.8%8.6%
Profit CAGR 5y14.4%4.7%

CPK bills 9.8× the revenue of RGCO, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (15.1% against 13.9%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

CPK vs RGCO, revenue by year
Fiscal year CPK RGCO
FY2025$930.0M$95.3M
FY2024$787.2M$84.6M
FY2023$670.6M$97.4M
FY2022$680.7M$84.2M
FY2021$570.0M$75.2M
FY2020$488.2M$63.1M
FY2019$479.6M$68.0M
FY2018$490.3M$66.0M
FY2017$449.6M$62.3M
FY2016$498.9M$59.1M
Net income by year

Bottom line

CPK vs RGCO, net income by year
Fiscal year CPK RGCO
FY2025$140.3M$13.3M
FY2024$118.6M$11.8M
FY2023$87.2M$11.3M
FY2022$89.8M$-31.7M
FY2021$83.5M$10.1M
FY2020$71.5M$10.6M
FY2019$65.2M$8.7M
FY2018$56.6M$7.3M
FY2017$58.1M$6.2M
FY2016$44.7M$5.8M
Revenue gap over time

16 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$834,665,788CPK
FY2024+$702,558,768CPK
FY2023+$573,160,235CPK
FY2022+$596,534,778CPK
FY2021+$494,793,221CPK
FY2020+$425,122,609CPK
FY2019+$411,578,475CPK
FY2018+$424,350,965CPK
FY2017+$387,349,130CPK
FY2016+$439,796,709CPK
FY2015+$391,054,393CPK
FY2014+$423,817,866CPK
FY2013+$381,100,334CPK
FY2012+$333,702,313CPK
FY2011+$347,228,129CPK
FY2010+$353,722,086CPK

CPK has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 16 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

16 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

16 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+1.2 ppCPK
FY2024+1.2 ppCPK
FY2023+1.4 ppCPK
FY2022+50.9 ppCPK
FY2021+1.2 ppCPK
FY2020−2.1 ppRGCO
FY2019+0.8 ppCPK
FY2018+0.5 ppCPK
FY2017+2.9 ppCPK
FY2016−0.9 ppRGCO
FY2015+1.5 ppCPK
FY2014+1.0 ppCPK
FY2013+0.6 ppCPK
FY2012+0.0 ppCPK
FY2011+0.0 ppCPK
FY2010+0.1 ppCPK

The higher net margin has changed hands between CPK and RGCO over this period.

16 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

RGCO's net margin has been more volatile than CPK's over the 16 comparable fiscal years — 12.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.3.

16 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between CPK and RGCO over these 16 fiscal years — CPK led in 14 and RGCO in 2.

16 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

RGCO's return on equity has been more volatile than CPK's over the 16 comparable fiscal years — 10.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.2.

16 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between CPK and RGCO over these 16 fiscal years — CPK led in 12 and RGCO in 4.

16 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages