Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CTSH VS EPAM

CTSH vs EPAM

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. and Epam Systems, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CTSH vs EPAM, at a glance
Metric CTSH EPAM
Revenue$21.1B$5.5B
Net income$2.2B$377.7M
Gross margin33.7%28.8%
Net margin10.6%6.9%
Return on equity15.2%10.3%
Diluted EPS$4.56$6.72
Dividend / share$1.24·
Payout ratio27.4%·
Free cash flow$2.6B$612.7M
Equity$15.0B$3.7B
Net debt / equity−0.09×−0.35×
Current ratio2.14×2.59×
Revenue CAGR 5y4.9%15.5%
Profit CAGR 5y9.9%2.9%

CTSH bills 3.9× the revenue of EPAM, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (10.6% against 6.9%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

CTSH vs EPAM, revenue by year
Fiscal year CTSH EPAM
FY2025$21.1B$5.5B
FY2024$19.7B$4.7B
FY2023$19.4B$4.7B
FY2022$19.4B$4.8B
FY2021$18.5B$3.8B
FY2020$16.7B$2.7B
FY2019$16.8B$2.3B
FY2018$16.1B$1.8B
FY2017$14.8B$1.5B
FY2016$13.5B$1.2B
Net income by year

Bottom line

CTSH vs EPAM, net income by year
Fiscal year CTSH EPAM
FY2025$2.2B$377.7M
FY2024$2.2B$454.5M
FY2023$2.1B$417.1M
FY2022$2.3B$419.4M
FY2021$2.1B$481.7M
FY2020$1.4B$327.2M
FY2019$1.8B$261.1M
FY2018$2.1B$240.3M
FY2017$1.5B$72.8M
FY2016$1.6B$99.3M
Revenue gap over time

16 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$15,650,944,000CTSH
FY2024+$15,008,060,000CTSH
FY2023+$14,662,460,000CTSH
FY2022+$14,603,302,000CTSH
FY2021+$14,748,856,000CTSH
FY2020+$13,992,522,000CTSH
FY2019+$14,489,202,000CTSH
FY2018+$14,282,088,000CTSH
FY2017+$13,359,552,000CTSH
FY2016+$12,326,868,000CTSH
FY2015+$11,501,872,000CTSH
FY2014+$9,532,973,000CTSH
FY2013+$8,288,083,000CTSH
FY2012+$6,912,673,000CTSH
FY2011+$5,786,628,000CTSH
FY2010+$4,370,565,000CTSH

CTSH has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 16 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

16 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

16 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+3.6 ppCTSH
FY2024+1.7 ppCTSH
FY2023+2.1 ppCTSH
FY2022+3.1 ppCTSH
FY2021−1.3 ppEPAM
FY2020−3.9 ppEPAM
FY2019−0.4 ppEPAM
FY2018−0.0 ppEPAM
FY2017+5.1 ppCTSH
FY2016+3.0 ppCTSH
FY2015+3.8 ppCTSH
FY2014+4.5 ppCTSH
FY2013+2.7 ppCTSH
FY2012+1.8 ppCTSH
FY2011+1.2 ppCTSH
FY2010+3.2 ppCTSH

The higher net margin has changed hands between CTSH and EPAM over this period.

16 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

EPAM's net margin has been more volatile than CTSH's over the 16 comparable fiscal years — 2.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.9.

16 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between CTSH and EPAM over these 16 fiscal years — CTSH led in 12 and EPAM in 4.

16 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

EPAM's return on equity has been more volatile than CTSH's over the 16 comparable fiscal years — 15.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.4.

16 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between CTSH and EPAM over these 16 fiscal years — CTSH led in 9 and EPAM in 7.

16 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages