FOCL vs PHG
Edap TMS SA and Koninklijke Philips NV, side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in EUR, drawn from SEC filings.
At a glance
Most recent reported year
| Metric | FOCL | PHG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | €70.5M | €17.8B |
| Net income | €-29.2M | €895.0M |
| Gross margin | 42.5% | 45.2% |
| Net margin | −41.5% | 5.0% |
| Return on equity | −94.5% | 7.8% |
| Diluted EPS | −€0.78 | €0.93 |
| Dividend / share | — | €0.85 |
| Payout ratio | — | −160.7% |
| Free cash flow | €-652,000 | — |
| Equity | €19.4M | €11.0B |
| Net debt / equity | −0.13× | 0.48× |
| Current ratio | 1.54× | 1.32× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 11.1% | 0.6% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | — | −5.5% |
PHG bills 252.9× the revenue of FOCL, and FOCL closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner.
Advertisement
AdSense · Leaderboard 728×90 · responsive
Revenue by year
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | FOCL | PHG |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | €70.5M | €17.8B |
| FY2024 | €69.4M | €18.0B |
| FY2023 | €60.4M | €18.2B |
| FY2022 | €55.1M | €17.8B |
| FY2021 | €44.1M | €17.2B |
| FY2020 | €41.6M | €17.3B |
| FY2019 | €44.9M | €17.1B |
| FY2018 | €39.2M | €18.1B |
| FY2017 | €35.7M | €17.8B |
| FY2016 | €35.6M | €17.4B |
Net income by year
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | FOCL | PHG |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | €-29.2M | €895.0M |
| FY2024 | €-20.6M | €-702.0M |
| FY2023 | €-21.2M | €-466.0M |
| FY2022 | €-2.9M | €-1.6B |
| FY2021 | €699,890 | €3.3B |
| FY2020 | €-1.7M | €1.2B |
| FY2019 | €1.5M | €1.2B |
| FY2018 | €-338,000 | €1.1B |
| FY2017 | €-681,345 | €1.7B |
| FY2016 | €3.8M | €1.4B |
Advertisement
AdSense · Rectangle 336×280