GEV vs NVDA
GE Vernova Inc. and Nvidia Corp., side by side — 4 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | GEV | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $38.1B | $215.9B |
| Net income | $4.9B | $120.1B |
| Gross margin | 19.8% | 71.1% |
| Net margin | 12.8% | 55.6% |
| Return on equity | 47.1% | 101.5% |
| Diluted EPS | $17.69 | $4.90 |
| Dividend / share | $1.25 | $0.04 |
| Payout ratio | 5.6% | 0.8% |
| Free cash flow | $3.7B | $96.7B |
| Equity | $11.2B | $157.3B |
| Net debt / equity | −0.79× | −0.01× |
| Current ratio | 0.98× | 3.91× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | · | 66.9% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | 94.3% |
NVDA bills 5.7× the revenue of GEV, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (55.6% against 12.8%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
4 years side by side
| Fiscal year | GEV | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $38.1B | $215.9B |
| FY2024 | $34.9B | $130.5B |
| FY2023 | $33.2B | $60.9B |
| FY2022 | $29.7B | $27.0B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | GEV | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $4.9B | $120.1B |
| FY2024 | $1.6B | $72.9B |
| FY2023 | $-438.0M | $29.8B |
| FY2022 | $-2.7B | $4.4B |
Standard deviation, each side
NVDA's net margin has been more volatile than GEV's over the 4 comparable fiscal years — 16.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 8.1.
4 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
NVDA led in net margin in every one of the 4 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
4 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
GEV's return on equity has been more volatile than NVDA's over the 3 comparable fiscal years — 21.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 11.5.
3 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
NVDA led in return on equity in every one of the 3 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
3 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.