Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / GILD VS NBIX

GILD vs NBIX

Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Neurocrine Biosciences Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

GILD vs NBIX, at a glance
Metric GILD NBIX
Revenue$29.4B$2.9B
Net income$8.5B$478.6M
Gross margin78.8%98.2%
Net margin28.9%16.7%
Return on equity40.5%16.4%
Diluted EPS$6.78$4.67
Dividend / share$3.16·
Payout ratio47.0%·
Free cash flow$9.5B$748.7M
Equity$22.7B$3.3B
Net debt / equity0.77×·
Current ratio1.55×3.39×
Revenue CAGR 5y3.6%22.3%
Profit CAGR 5y133.3%3.3%

GILD bills 10.3× the revenue of NBIX, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (28.9% against 16.7%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

GILD vs NBIX, revenue by year
Fiscal year GILD NBIX
FY2025$29.4B$2.9B
FY2024$28.8B$2.4B
FY2023$27.1B$1.9B
FY2022$27.3B$1.5B
FY2021$27.3B$1.1B
FY2020$24.7B$1.0B
FY2019$22.4B$788.1M
FY2018$22.1B$451.2M
FY2017$26.1B$161.6M
FY2016$30.4B$15.0M
Net income by year

Bottom line

GILD vs NBIX, net income by year
Fiscal year GILD NBIX
FY2025$8.5B$478.6M
FY2024$480.0M$341.3M
FY2023$5.7B$249.7M
FY2022$4.6B$154.5M
FY2021$6.2B$89.6M
FY2020$123.0M$407.3M
FY2019$5.4B$37.0M
FY2018$5.5B$21.1M
FY2017$4.6B$-142.5M
FY2016$13.5B$-141.1M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$26,582,500,000GILD
FY2024+$26,398,700,000GILD
FY2023+$25,228,900,000GILD
FY2022+$25,792,300,000GILD
FY2021+$26,171,500,000GILD
FY2020+$23,643,100,000GILD
FY2019+$21,660,900,000GILD
FY2018+$21,675,800,000GILD
FY2017+$25,945,374,000GILD
FY2016+$30,375,000,000GILD
FY2015+$32,619,231,000GILD
FY2014+$24,890,000,000GILD
FY2013+$11,199,081,000GILD
FY2012+$9,648,860,000GILD
FY2011+$8,307,972,000GILD
FY2010+$7,915,919,000GILD
FY2009+$7,008,430,000GILD

GILD has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

14 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+12.2 ppGILD
FY2024−12.8 ppNBIX
FY2023+7.5 ppGILD
FY2022+6.4 ppGILD
FY2021+14.8 ppGILD
FY2020−38.6 ppNBIX
FY2019+19.2 ppGILD
FY2018+20.0 ppGILD
FY2017+106.0 ppGILD
FY2016+985.0 ppGILD
FY2015+505.3 ppGILD
FY2012+17.1 ppGILD
FY2011−15.3 ppNBIX
FY2010+60.1 ppGILD

The higher net margin has changed hands between GILD and NBIX over this period.

14 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

NBIX's net margin has been more volatile than GILD's over the 14 comparable fiscal years — 263.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 14.2.

14 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between GILD and NBIX over these 14 fiscal years — GILD led in 11 and NBIX in 3.

14 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

NBIX's return on equity has been more volatile than GILD's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 305.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 27.2.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between GILD and NBIX over these 17 fiscal years — GILD led in 14 and NBIX in 3.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages