Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / GILD VS QGEN

GILD vs QGEN

Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Qiagen N.v., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

GILD vs QGEN, at a glance
Metric GILD QGEN
Revenue$29.4B$2.1B
Net income$8.5B$424.9M
Gross margin78.8%62.2%
Net margin28.9%20.3%
Return on equity40.5%11.6%
Diluted EPS$6.78$1.94
Dividend / share$3.16$0.25
Payout ratio47.0%12.8%
Free cash flow$9.5B$453.3M
Equity$22.7B$3.8B
Net debt / equity0.77×0.22×
Current ratio1.55×3.90×
Revenue CAGR 5y3.6%2.2%
Profit CAGR 5y133.3%3.4%

GILD bills 14.1× the revenue of QGEN, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (28.9% against 20.3%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

GILD vs QGEN, revenue by year
Fiscal year GILD QGEN
FY2025$29.4B$2.1B
FY2024$28.8B$2.0B
FY2023$27.1B$2.0B
FY2022$27.3B$2.1B
FY2021$27.3B$2.3B
FY2020$24.7B$1.9B
FY2019$22.4B$1.5B
FY2018$22.1B$1.5B
FY2017$26.1B$1.4B
FY2016$30.4B$1.3B
Net income by year

Bottom line

GILD vs QGEN, net income by year
Fiscal year GILD QGEN
FY2025$8.5B$424.9M
FY2024$480.0M$83.6M
FY2023$5.7B$341.3M
FY2022$4.6B$423.2M
FY2021$6.2B$512.6M
FY2020$123.0M$359.2M
FY2019$5.4B$-41.5M
FY2018$5.5B$190.4M
FY2017$4.6B$40.4M
FY2016$13.5B$80.4M
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$27,353,001,000GILD
FY2024+$26,775,786,000GILD
FY2023+$25,150,689,000GILD
FY2022+$25,139,482,000GILD
FY2021+$25,053,343,000GILD
FY2020+$22,818,654,000GILD
FY2019+$20,922,576,000GILD
FY2018+$20,625,152,000GILD
FY2017+$24,689,464,000GILD
FY2016+$29,052,009,000GILD
FY2015+$31,358,014,000GILD
FY2014+$23,545,223,000GILD
FY2013+$9,900,016,000GILD
FY2012+$8,447,544,000GILD
FY2011+$7,215,638,000GILD
FY2010+$6,861,989,000GILD
FY2009+$6,001,558,000GILD
FY2008+$4,442,775,000GILD

GILD has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 18 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+8.6 ppGILD
FY2024−2.6 ppQGEN
FY2023+3.3 ppGILD
FY2022−3.0 ppQGEN
FY2021−0.1 ppQGEN
FY2020−18.8 ppQGEN
FY2019+26.6 ppGILD
FY2018+12.0 ppGILD
FY2017+14.9 ppGILD
FY2016+38.4 ppGILD
FY2015+45.3 ppGILD
FY2014+39.8 ppGILD
FY2013+22.0 ppGILD
FY2012+16.2 ppGILD
FY2011+25.1 ppGILD
FY2010+23.1 ppGILD
FY2009+23.8 ppGILD
FY2008+26.9 ppGILD

The higher net margin has changed hands between GILD and QGEN over this period.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

GILD's net margin has been more volatile than QGEN's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 14.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 6.7.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between GILD and QGEN over these 18 fiscal years — GILD led in 14 and QGEN in 4.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

GILD's return on equity has been more volatile than QGEN's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 26.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.7.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between GILD and QGEN over these 18 fiscal years — GILD led in 17 and QGEN in 1.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages