HVT vs LOVE
Haverty Furniture Companies Inc. and Lovesac Co., side by side — 9 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | HVT | LOVE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $759.0M | $697.1M |
| Net income | $19.7M | $4.1M |
| Gross margin | 60.7% | 56.4% |
| Net margin | 2.6% | 0.6% |
| Return on equity | 6.4% | 1.9% |
| Diluted EPS | · | $0.28 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | 105.6% | · |
| Free cash flow | $33.0M | $26.2M |
| Equity | $307.9M | $218.7M |
| Net debt / equity | · | · |
| Current ratio | 1.87× | 1.61× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 0.3% | 16.8% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | −19.7% | −22.7% |
HVT and LOVE book revenue within 15% of each other, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (2.6% against 0.6%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
9 years side by side
| Fiscal year | HVT | LOVE |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $759.0M | $697.1M |
| FY2024 | $722.9M | $680.6M |
| FY2023 | $862.1M | $700.3M |
| FY2022 | $1.0B | $651.2M |
| FY2021 | $1.0B | $498.2M |
| FY2020 | $748.3M | $320.7M |
| FY2019 | $802.3M | $233.4M |
| FY2018 | $817.7M | $165.9M |
| FY2017 | $819.9M | $101.8M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | HVT | LOVE |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $19.7M | $4.1M |
| FY2024 | $20.0M | $11.6M |
| FY2023 | $56.3M | $23.9M |
| FY2022 | $89.4M | $26.5M |
| FY2021 | $90.8M | $47.5M |
| FY2020 | $59.1M | $14.7M |
| FY2019 | $21.9M | $-15.2M |
| FY2018 | $30.3M | $-6.7M |
| FY2017 | $21.1M | $-5.5M |
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$61,880,000 | HVT |
| FY2024 | +$42,271,000 | HVT |
| FY2023 | +$161,868,000 | HVT |
| FY2022 | +$396,036,000 | HVT |
| FY2021 | +$514,560,000 | HVT |
| FY2020 | +$427,514,000 | HVT |
| FY2019 | +$568,914,000 | HVT |
| FY2018 | +$651,851,703 | HVT |
| FY2017 | +$718,055,587 | HVT |
HVT has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 9 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
9 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +2.0 pp | HVT |
| FY2024 | +1.1 pp | HVT |
| FY2023 | +3.1 pp | HVT |
| FY2022 | +4.5 pp | HVT |
| FY2021 | −0.6 pp | LOVE |
| FY2020 | +3.3 pp | HVT |
| FY2019 | +9.2 pp | HVT |
| FY2018 | +7.7 pp | HVT |
| FY2017 | +8.0 pp | HVT |
The higher net margin has changed hands between HVT and LOVE over this period.
9 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
LOVE's net margin has been more volatile than HVT's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 5.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.6.
9 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between HVT and LOVE over these 9 fiscal years — HVT led in 8 and LOVE in 1.
9 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
LOVE's return on equity has been more volatile than HVT's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 17.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 10.9.
9 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between HVT and LOVE over these 9 fiscal years — HVT led in 8 and LOVE in 1.
9 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.