Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / HYFT VS MCUJF

HYFT vs MCUJF

MindWalk Holdings Corp. and Medicure Inc., side by side — 6 fiscal years reported in CAD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

HYFT vs MCUJF, at a glance
Metric HYFT MCUJF
RevenueCAD 24.5MCAD 21.9M
Net incomeCAD -30.2MCAD -1.0M
Gross margin55.3%59.7%
Net margin−123.3%−4.7%
Return on equity−102.0%−5.1%
Diluted EPS−CAD 0.91−CAD 0.10
Dividend / share··
Payout ratio··
Free cash flowCAD -7.2MCAD 638,000
Equity··
Net debt / equity··
Current ratio2.08×1.89×
Revenue CAGR 5y11.8%1.7%
Profit CAGR 5y··

HYFT and MCUJF book revenue within 15% of each other, and both closed the last reported year at a loss.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

6 years side by side

HYFT vs MCUJF, revenue by year
Fiscal year HYFT MCUJF
FY2024CAD 24.5MCAD 21.9M
FY2023CAD 24.5MCAD 21.7M
FY2022CAD 20.7MCAD 23.1M
FY2021CAD 19.4MCAD 21.7M
FY2020CAD 17.9MCAD 11.6M
FY2019CAD 14.1MCAD 20.2M
Net income by year

Bottom line

HYFT vs MCUJF, net income by year
Fiscal year HYFT MCUJF
FY2024CAD -30.2MCAD -1.0M
FY2023CAD -26.1MCAD -922,000
FY2022CAD -26.6MCAD 1.4M
FY2021CAD -16.7MCAD -727,000
FY2020CAD -7.3MCAD -6.8M
FY2019CAD -4.9MCAD -19.8M
Revenue gap over time

6 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2024+CAD 2,613,000HYFT
FY2023+CAD 2,824,000HYFT
FY2022−CAD 2,400,000MCUJF
FY2021−CAD 2,380,000MCUJF
FY2020+CAD 6,302,000HYFT
FY2019−CAD 6,115,000MCUJF

The higher-revenue side has changed between HYFT and MCUJF over this period. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

6 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

6 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2024−118.6 ppMCUJF
FY2023−102.3 ppMCUJF
FY2022−134.4 ppMCUJF
FY2021−82.9 ppMCUJF
FY2020+18.0 ppHYFT
FY2019+62.9 ppHYFT

The higher net margin has changed hands between HYFT and MCUJF over this period.

6 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

MCUJF's net margin has been more volatile than HYFT's over the 6 comparable fiscal years — 38.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 37.0.

6 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between HYFT and MCUJF over these 6 fiscal years — HYFT led in 2 and MCUJF in 4.

6 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

HYFT's return on equity has been more volatile than MCUJF's over the 6 comparable fiscal years — 27.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 15.3.

6 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between HYFT and MCUJF over these 6 fiscal years — HYFT led in 2 and MCUJF in 4.

6 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages