Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / IMKTA VS KR

IMKTA vs KR

Ingles Markets Inc. and Kroger Co., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

IMKTA vs KR, at a glance
Metric IMKTA KR
Revenue$5.3B$147.6B
Net income$83.6M$1.0B
Gross margin23.9%23.3%
Net margin1.6%0.7%
Return on equity5.3%14.3%
Diluted EPS·$1.54
Dividend / share·$1.37
Payout ratio14.7%87.1%
Free cash flow$39.6M$3.5B
Equity$1.6B$5.9B
Net debt / equity0.09×2.12×
Current ratio3.22×0.80×
Revenue CAGR 5y3.0%2.2%
Profit CAGR 5y−14.1%−17.0%

KR bills 27.7× the revenue of IMKTA, and IMKTA keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (1.6% against 0.7%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

IMKTA vs KR, revenue by year
Fiscal year IMKTA KR
FY2025$5.3B$147.6B
FY2024$5.6B$147.1B
FY2023$5.9B$150.0B
FY2022$5.7B$148.3B
FY2021$5.0B$137.9B
FY2020$4.6B$132.5B
FY2019$4.2B$122.3B
FY2018$4.1B$121.9B
FY2017$4.0B$123.3B
FY2016$3.8B$115.3B
Net income by year

Bottom line

IMKTA vs KR, net income by year
Fiscal year IMKTA KR
FY2025$83.6M$1.0B
FY2024$105.5M$2.7B
FY2023$210.8M$2.2B
FY2022$272.8M$2.2B
FY2021$249.7M$1.7B
FY2020$178.6M$2.6B
FY2019$81.6M$1.7B
FY2018$97.4M$3.1B
FY2017$53.9M$1.9B
FY2016$54.2M$2.0B
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$142,307,967,391KR
FY2024−$141,483,390,566KR
FY2023−$144,146,218,268KR
FY2022−$142,579,164,968KR
FY2021−$132,900,080,397KR
FY2020−$127,887,390,975KR
FY2019−$118,083,966,390KR
FY2018−$117,759,195,123KR
FY2017−$119,277,300,273KR
FY2016−$111,542,022,594KR
FY2015−$106,051,356,218KR
FY2014−$104,629,014,047KR
FY2013−$94,636,459,539KR
FY2012−$92,900,685,349KR
FY2011−$86,699,976,906KR
FY2010−$78,658,948,160KR
FY2009−$73,358,066,846KR

KR has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

16 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+0.9 ppIMKTA
FY2024+0.1 ppIMKTA
FY2023+2.1 ppIMKTA
FY2022+3.3 ppIMKTA
FY2021+3.8 ppIMKTA
FY2020+1.9 ppIMKTA
FY2019+0.7 ppIMKTA
FY2018−0.1 ppKR
FY2017−0.2 ppKR
FY2016−0.3 ppKR
FY2015−0.3 ppKR
FY2014−0.3 ppKR
FY2013−1.0 ppKR
FY2012−0.4 ppKR
FY2011+0.4 ppIMKTA
FY2009+0.8 ppIMKTA

The higher net margin has changed hands between IMKTA and KR over this period.

16 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

IMKTA's net margin has been more volatile than KR's over the 16 comparable fiscal years — 1.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 0.6.

16 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between IMKTA and KR over these 16 fiscal years — IMKTA led in 9 and KR in 7.

16 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

KR's return on equity has been more volatile than IMKTA's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 9.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 6.7.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between IMKTA and KR over these 17 fiscal years — IMKTA led in 3 and KR in 14.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages