Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / IP VS KMB

IP vs KMB

International Paper Co. and Kimberly Clark Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

IP vs KMB, at a glance
Metric IP KMB
Revenue$23.6B$16.4B
Net income$-3.5B$2.0B
Gross margin29.6%36.0%
Net margin−14.9%12.5%
Return on equity−30.6%172.6%
Diluted EPS−$6.95$6.07
Dividend / share$1.85$5.04
Payout ratio−27.8%82.1%
Free cash flow$-159.0M$1.6B
Equity$14.8B$1.5B
Net debt / equity0.59×4.31×
Current ratio1.28×0.75×
Revenue CAGR 5y6.1%−3.0%
Profit CAGR 5y·−3.0%

IP bills 1.4× the revenue of KMB, and IP closed the last reported year at a loss.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

IP vs KMB, revenue by year
Fiscal year IP KMB
FY2025$23.6B$16.4B
FY2024$15.8B$16.8B
FY2023$16.0B$17.1B
FY2022$21.2B$20.2B
FY2021$19.4B$19.4B
FY2020$17.6B$19.1B
FY2019$18.3B$18.4B
FY2018$23.3B$18.5B
FY2017$21.7B$18.3B
FY2016$19.5B$18.3B
Net income by year

Bottom line

IP vs KMB, net income by year
Fiscal year IP KMB
FY2025$-3.5B$2.0B
FY2024$557.0M$2.5B
FY2023$288.0M$1.8B
FY2022$1.5B$1.9B
FY2021$1.8B$1.8B
FY2020$482.0M$2.4B
FY2019$1.2B$2.2B
FY2018$2.0B$1.4B
FY2017$2.1B$2.3B
FY2016$904.0M$2.2B
Revenue gap over time

19 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$7,187,000,000IP
FY2024−$970,000,000KMB
FY2023−$1,113,000,000KMB
FY2022+$986,000,000IP
FY2021−$77,000,000KMB
FY2020−$1,575,000,000KMB
FY2019−$133,000,000KMB
FY2018+$4,820,000,000IP
FY2017+$3,395,000,000IP
FY2016+$1,208,000,000IP
FY2015+$2,084,000,000IP
FY2014+$3,893,000,000IP
FY2013+$3,922,000,000IP
FY2012+$2,385,000,000IP
FY2011+$5,188,000,000IP
FY2010+$5,433,000,000IP
FY2009+$4,251,000,000IP
FY2008+$5,414,000,000IP
FY2007+$3,624,000,000IP

The higher-revenue side has changed between IP and KMB over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

19 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−27.3 ppKMB
FY2024−11.8 ppKMB
FY2023−8.5 ppKMB
FY2022−2.6 ppKMB
FY2021−0.4 ppKMB
FY2020−9.8 ppKMB
FY2019−5.2 ppKMB
FY2018+0.8 ppIP
FY2017−2.8 ppKMB
FY2016−7.5 ppKMB
FY2015−1.3 ppKMB
FY2014−5.8 ppKMB
FY2013−5.5 ppKMB
FY2012−5.7 ppKMB
FY2011−2.9 ppKMB
FY2010−7.0 ppKMB
FY2009−7.5 ppKMB
FY2008−14.6 ppKMB
FY2007−5.2 ppKMB

The higher net margin has changed hands between IP and KMB over this period.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

IP's net margin has been more volatile than KMB's over the 19 comparable fiscal years — 5.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.1.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between IP and KMB over these 19 fiscal years — IP led in 1 and KMB in 18.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

KMB's return on equity has been more volatile than IP's over the 12 comparable fiscal years — 124.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 15.3.

12 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

KMB led in return on equity in every one of the 12 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

12 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages