Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / KBR VS MTZ

KBR vs MTZ

Kbr, Inc. and MasTec Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

KBR vs MTZ, at a glance
Metric KBR MTZ
Revenue$7.8B$14.3B
Net income$415.0M$399.0M
Gross margin14.8%12.5%
Net margin5.2%3.0%
Return on equity28.1%12.9%
Diluted EPS$3.21$5.07
Dividend / share$0.66·
Payout ratio20.2%·
Free cash flow$515.0M$285.7M
Equity$1.5B$3.3B
Net debt / equity1.39×0.55×
Current ratio1.22×1.32×
Revenue CAGR 5y6.2%17.7%
Profit CAGR 5y·4.3%

MTZ bills 1.8× the revenue of KBR, and KBR keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (5.2% against 3.0%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

KBR vs MTZ, revenue by year
Fiscal year KBR MTZ
FY2025$7.8B$14.3B
FY2024$7.7B$12.3B
FY2023$7.0B$12.0B
FY2022$6.6B$9.8B
FY2021$7.3B$8.0B
FY2020$5.8B$6.3B
FY2019$5.6B$7.2B
FY2018$4.9B$6.9B
FY2017$4.2B$6.6B
FY2016$4.3B$5.1B
Net income by year

Bottom line

KBR vs MTZ, net income by year
Fiscal year KBR MTZ
FY2025$415.0M$399.0M
FY2024$375.0M$162.8M
FY2023$-265.0M$-49.9M
FY2022$190.0M$33.4M
FY2021$27.0M$328.8M
FY2020$-63.0M$322.8M
FY2019$202.0M$392.3M
FY2018$281.0M$259.7M
FY2017$432.0M$347.2M
FY2016$-61.0M$131.3M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$6,513,171,000MTZ
FY2024−$4,593,464,000MTZ
FY2023−$5,039,934,000MTZ
FY2022−$3,214,038,000MTZ
FY2021−$612,781,000MTZ
FY2020−$553,975,000MTZ
FY2019−$1,544,188,000MTZ
FY2018−$1,996,417,000MTZ
FY2017−$2,435,978,000MTZ
FY2016−$866,703,000MTZ
FY2015+$887,670,000KBR
FY2014+$1,754,197,000KBR
FY2013+$2,889,213,000KBR
FY2012+$4,043,211,000KBR
FY2011+$6,271,708,000KBR
FY2010+$6,959,976,000KBR
FY2009+$10,481,498,000KBR

The higher-revenue side has changed between KBR and MTZ over this period. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+2.2 ppKBR
FY2024+3.3 ppKBR
FY2023−3.4 ppMTZ
FY2022+2.6 ppKBR
FY2021−3.7 ppMTZ
FY2020−5.8 ppMTZ
FY2019−1.8 ppMTZ
FY2018+2.6 ppKBR
FY2017+5.3 ppKBR
FY2016−3.8 ppMTZ
FY2015+6.3 ppKBR
FY2014−21.3 ppMTZ
FY2013−0.9 ppMTZ
FY2012−0.3 ppMTZ
FY2011+2.2 ppKBR
FY2010+0.1 ppKBR
FY2009−1.4 ppMTZ

The higher net margin has changed hands between KBR and MTZ over this period.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

KBR's net margin has been more volatile than MTZ's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 6.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.0.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between KBR and MTZ over these 17 fiscal years — KBR led in 8 and MTZ in 9.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

KBR's return on equity has been more volatile than MTZ's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 24.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 8.5.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between KBR and MTZ over these 17 fiscal years — KBR led in 7 and MTZ in 10.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages