Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / KMB VS PKG

KMB vs PKG

Kimberly Clark Corp. and Packaging Corp. of America, side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

KMB vs PKG, at a glance
Metric KMB PKG
Revenue$16.4B$9.0B
Net income$2.0B$774.1M
Gross margin36.0%21.0%
Net margin12.5%8.6%
Return on equity172.6%17.2%
Diluted EPS$6.07$8.58
Dividend / share$5.04$5.00
Payout ratio82.1%58.1%
Free cash flow$1.6B$728.6M
Equity$1.5B$4.6B
Net debt / equity4.31×0.75×
Current ratio0.75×3.17×
Revenue CAGR 5y−3.0%6.2%
Profit CAGR 5y−3.0%10.9%

KMB bills 1.8× the revenue of PKG, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (12.5% against 8.6%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

KMB vs PKG, revenue by year
Fiscal year KMB PKG
FY2025$16.4B$9.0B
FY2024$16.8B$8.4B
FY2023$17.1B$7.8B
FY2022$20.2B$8.5B
FY2021$19.4B$7.7B
FY2020$19.1B$6.7B
FY2019$18.4B$7.0B
FY2018$18.5B$7.0B
FY2017$18.3B$6.4B
FY2016$18.3B$5.8B
Net income by year

Bottom line

KMB vs PKG, net income by year
Fiscal year KMB PKG
FY2025$2.0B$774.1M
FY2024$2.5B$805.1M
FY2023$1.8B$765.2M
FY2022$1.9B$1.0B
FY2021$1.8B$841.1M
FY2020$2.4B$461.0M
FY2019$2.2B$696.4M
FY2018$1.4B$738.0M
FY2017$2.3B$668.6M
FY2016$2.2B$449.6M
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$7,457,700,000KMB
FY2024+$8,421,700,000KMB
FY2023+$9,343,600,000KMB
FY2022+$11,697,000,000KMB
FY2021+$11,709,700,000KMB
FY2020+$12,481,800,000KMB
FY2019+$11,485,700,000KMB
FY2018+$11,471,400,000KMB
FY2017+$11,903,100,000KMB
FY2016+$12,508,000,000KMB
FY2015+$12,849,300,000KMB
FY2014+$13,871,400,000KMB
FY2013+$15,895,700,000KMB
FY2012+$16,623,100,000KMB
FY2011+$18,225,889,000KMB
FY2010+$17,310,394,000KMB
FY2009+$16,967,411,000KMB
FY2008+$17,054,507,000KMB

KMB has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 18 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+3.8 ppKMB
FY2024+5.7 ppKMB
FY2023+0.5 ppKMB
FY2022−2.4 ppPKG
FY2021−1.4 ppPKG
FY2020+5.6 ppKMB
FY2019+1.9 ppKMB
FY2018−2.7 ppPKG
FY2017+2.3 ppKMB
FY2016+4.4 ppKMB
FY2015−1.9 ppPKG
FY2014+1.4 ppKMB
FY2013−0.7 ppPKG
FY2012+3.8 ppKMB
FY2011+2.0 ppKMB
FY2010+1.4 ppKMB
FY2009−1.9 ppPKG
FY2008+3.7 ppKMB

The higher net margin has changed hands between KMB and PKG over this period.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

KMB's net margin has been more volatile than PKG's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 2.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.2.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between KMB and PKG over these 18 fiscal years — KMB led in 12 and PKG in 6.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

KMB's return on equity has been more volatile than PKG's over the 12 comparable fiscal years — 124.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 6.6.

12 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

KMB led in return on equity in every one of the 12 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

12 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages