Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / APO VS MS

APO vs MS

Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Morgan Stanley, side by side — 6 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

APO vs MS, at a glance
Metric APO MS
Revenue$32.0B$70.6B
Net income$3.5B$16.9B
Gross margin··
Net margin16.9%24.1%
Return on equity17.2%15.6%
Diluted EPS$5.54$10.21
Dividend / share$1.99$3.85
Payout ratio34.4%39.1%
Free cash flow··
Equity$23.3B$111.6B
Net debt / equity−0.31×2.06×
Current ratio··
Revenue CAGR 5y68.6%7.7%
Profit CAGR 5y86.0%8.9%

MS bills 2.2× the revenue of APO, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (24.1% against 16.9%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

6 years side by side

APO vs MS, revenue by year
Fiscal year APO MS
FY2025$32.0B$70.6B
FY2024$26.1B$61.8B
FY2023$32.6B$54.1B
FY2022$11.0B$53.7B
FY2021$6.0B$59.8B
FY2020$2.4B$48.8B
Net income by year

Bottom line

APO vs MS, net income by year
Fiscal year APO MS
FY2025$3.5B$16.9B
FY2024$4.6B$13.4B
FY2023$5.0B$9.1B
FY2022$-2.0B$11.0B
FY2021$1.8B$15.0B
FY2020$157.0M$11.0B
Revenue gap over time

6 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$38,596,000,000MS
FY2024−$35,647,000,000MS
FY2023−$21,499,000,000MS
FY2022−$42,700,000,000MS
FY2021−$53,804,000,000MS
FY2020−$46,403,000,000MS

MS has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 6 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

6 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

6 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−7.2 ppMS
FY2024+2.5 ppAPO
FY2023+2.9 ppAPO
FY2022−52.8 ppMS
FY2021+46.4 ppAPO
FY2020−3.1 ppMS

The higher net margin has changed hands between APO and MS over this period.

6 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

APO's net margin has been more volatile than MS's over the 6 comparable fiscal years — 30.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.6.

6 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between APO and MS over these 6 fiscal years — APO led in 3 and MS in 3.

6 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

APO's return on equity has been more volatile than MS's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 31.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.4.

5 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between APO and MS over these 5 fiscal years — APO led in 4 and MS in 1.

5 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages