ARCB vs SNDR
Arcbest Corp. and Schneider National, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | ARCB | SNDR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.0B | $5.7B |
| Net income | $60.1M | $103.6M |
| Gross margin | · | · |
| Net margin | 1.5% | 1.8% |
| Return on equity | 4.6% | 3.4% |
| Diluted EPS | $2.62 | $0.59 |
| Dividend / share | · | $0.38 |
| Payout ratio | 18.3% | 64.7% |
| Free cash flow | $114.2M | $285.4M |
| Equity | $1.3B | $3.0B |
| Net debt / equity | 0.09× | 0.06× |
| Current ratio | 0.95× | 2.13× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 6.4% | 4.5% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | −3.3% | −13.3% |
SNDR bills 1.4× the revenue of ARCB, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (1.8% against 1.5%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | ARCB | SNDR |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $4.0B | $5.7B |
| FY2024 | $4.2B | $5.3B |
| FY2023 | $4.4B | $5.5B |
| FY2022 | $5.0B | $6.6B |
| FY2021 | $3.8B | $5.6B |
| FY2020 | $2.9B | $4.6B |
| FY2019 | $3.0B | $4.7B |
| FY2018 | $3.1B | $5.0B |
| FY2017 | $2.8B | $4.4B |
| FY2016 | $2.7B | $4.0B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | ARCB | SNDR |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $60.1M | $103.6M |
| FY2024 | $174.0M | $117.0M |
| FY2023 | $195.4M | $238.5M |
| FY2022 | $298.2M | $457.8M |
| FY2021 | $213.5M | $405.4M |
| FY2020 | $71.1M | $211.7M |
| FY2019 | $40.0M | $147.0M |
| FY2018 | $67.3M | $268.9M |
| FY2017 | $59.7M | $389.9M |
| FY2016 | $18.7M | $156.9M |
11 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$1,664,142,000 | SNDR |
| FY2024 | −$1,111,481,000 | SNDR |
| FY2023 | −$1,071,457,000 | SNDR |
| FY2022 | −$1,575,392,000 | SNDR |
| FY2021 | −$1,842,515,000 | SNDR |
| FY2020 | −$1,612,637,000 | SNDR |
| FY2019 | −$1,758,690,000 | SNDR |
| FY2018 | −$1,883,212,000 | SNDR |
| FY2017 | −$1,557,143,000 | SNDR |
| FY2016 | −$1,345,481,000 | SNDR |
| FY2015 | −$1,292,495,000 | SNDR |
SNDR has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 11 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
11 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
11 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −0.3 pp | SNDR |
| FY2024 | +2.0 pp | ARCB |
| FY2023 | +0.1 pp | ARCB |
| FY2022 | −1.0 pp | SNDR |
| FY2021 | −1.6 pp | SNDR |
| FY2020 | −2.2 pp | SNDR |
| FY2019 | −1.8 pp | SNDR |
| FY2018 | −3.2 pp | SNDR |
| FY2017 | −6.8 pp | SNDR |
| FY2016 | −3.2 pp | SNDR |
| FY2015 | −1.9 pp | SNDR |
The higher net margin has changed hands between ARCB and SNDR over this period.
11 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
SNDR's net margin has been more volatile than ARCB's over the 11 comparable fiscal years — 2.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.7.
11 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between ARCB and SNDR over these 11 fiscal years — ARCB led in 2 and SNDR in 9.
11 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
ARCB's return on equity has been more volatile than SNDR's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 8.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.3.
8 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between ARCB and SNDR over these 8 fiscal years — ARCB led in 5 and SNDR in 3.
8 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.