ARMK vs YUMC
Aramark and Yum China Holdings, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
At a glance
Most recent reported year
| Metric | ARMK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.5B | $11.8B |
| Net income | $326.4M | $929.0M |
| Gross margin | −7.9% | 25.0% |
| Net margin | 1.8% | 7.9% |
| Return on equity | 10.6% | 16.7% |
| Diluted EPS | $1.22 | $2.51 |
| Dividend / share | $0.42 | $0.96 |
| Payout ratio | 34.0% | 38.0% |
| Free cash flow | $431.8M | $840.0M |
| Equity | $3.1B | $5.4B |
| Net debt / equity | 1.50× | −0.09× |
| Current ratio | 0.99× | 1.05× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 7.6% | 7.4% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | — | 3.5% |
ARMK bills 1.6× the revenue of YUMC, and YUMC keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (7.9% against 1.8%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner.
Advertisement
AdSense · Leaderboard 728×90 · responsive
Revenue by year
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | ARMK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $18.5B | $11.8B |
| FY2024 | $17.4B | $11.3B |
| FY2023 | $16.1B | $11.0B |
| FY2022 | $13.7B | $9.6B |
| FY2021 | $12.1B | $9.9B |
| FY2020 | $12.8B | $8.3B |
| FY2019 | $16.2B | $8.8B |
| FY2018 | $15.8B | $8.4B |
| FY2017 | $14.6B | $7.8B |
| FY2016 | $14.4B | $7.1B |
Net income by year
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | ARMK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $326.4M | $929.0M |
| FY2024 | $262.5M | $911.0M |
| FY2023 | $674.1M | $827.0M |
| FY2022 | $194.5M | $442.0M |
| FY2021 | $-90.8M | $990.0M |
| FY2020 | $-461.5M | $784.0M |
| FY2019 | $448.5M | $713.0M |
| FY2018 | $567.9M | $708.0M |
| FY2017 | $373.9M | $398.0M |
| FY2016 | $287.8M | $498.0M |
Advertisement
AdSense · Rectangle 336×280
More in this industry