ARMK vs YUMC
Aramark and Yum China Holdings, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | ARMK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.5B | $11.8B |
| Net income | $326.4M | $929.0M |
| Gross margin | 8.4% | · |
| Net margin | 1.8% | 8.5% |
| Return on equity | 10.6% | 16.7% |
| Diluted EPS | $1.22 | $2.51 |
| Dividend / share | $0.42 | $0.96 |
| Payout ratio | 34.0% | 38.0% |
| Free cash flow | $431.8M | $840.0M |
| Equity | $3.1B | $5.4B |
| Net debt / equity | 1.50× | −0.09× |
| Current ratio | 0.99× | 1.05× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 7.6% | 7.4% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | 3.5% |
ARMK bills 1.6× the revenue of YUMC, and YUMC keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (8.5% against 1.8%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | ARMK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $18.5B | $11.8B |
| FY2024 | $17.4B | $11.3B |
| FY2023 | $16.1B | $11.0B |
| FY2022 | $13.7B | $9.6B |
| FY2021 | $12.1B | $9.9B |
| FY2020 | $12.8B | $8.3B |
| FY2019 | $16.2B | $8.8B |
| FY2018 | $15.8B | $8.4B |
| FY2017 | $14.6B | $7.8B |
| FY2016 | $14.4B | $7.1B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | ARMK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $326.4M | $929.0M |
| FY2024 | $262.5M | $911.0M |
| FY2023 | $674.1M | $827.0M |
| FY2022 | $194.5M | $442.0M |
| FY2021 | $-90.8M | $990.0M |
| FY2020 | $-461.5M | $784.0M |
| FY2019 | $448.5M | $713.0M |
| FY2018 | $567.9M | $708.0M |
| FY2017 | $373.9M | $398.0M |
| FY2016 | $287.8M | $498.0M |
12 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$6,709,299,000 | ARMK |
| FY2024 | +$6,097,701,000 | ARMK |
| FY2023 | +$5,105,212,000 | ARMK |
| FY2022 | +$4,118,269,000 | ARMK |
| FY2021 | +$2,242,965,000 | ARMK |
| FY2020 | +$4,566,559,000 | ARMK |
| FY2019 | +$7,451,341,000 | ARMK |
| FY2018 | +$7,374,633,000 | ARMK |
| FY2017 | +$6,835,412,000 | ARMK |
| FY2016 | +$7,340,829,000 | ARMK |
| FY2015 | +$7,420,135,000 | ARMK |
| FY2014 | +$7,898,913,000 | ARMK |
ARMK has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 12 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
12 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
12 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −6.7 pp | YUMC |
| FY2024 | −7.2 pp | YUMC |
| FY2023 | −4.0 pp | YUMC |
| FY2022 | −3.6 pp | YUMC |
| FY2021 | −11.1 pp | YUMC |
| FY2020 | −13.4 pp | YUMC |
| FY2019 | −5.7 pp | YUMC |
| FY2018 | −5.1 pp | YUMC |
| FY2017 | −2.9 pp | YUMC |
| FY2016 | −5.2 pp | YUMC |
| FY2015 | −3.1 pp | YUMC |
| FY2014 | +1.5 pp | ARMK |
The higher net margin has changed hands between ARMK and YUMC over this period.
12 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
YUMC's net margin has been more volatile than ARMK's over the 12 comparable fiscal years — 2.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.0.
12 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between ARMK and YUMC over these 12 fiscal years — ARMK led in 1 and YUMC in 11.
12 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
ARMK's return on equity has been more volatile than YUMC's over the 11 comparable fiscal years — 10.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.1.
11 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between ARMK and YUMC over these 11 fiscal years — ARMK led in 3 and YUMC in 8.
11 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.