Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / ATNI VS IDT

ATNI vs IDT

ATN International, Inc. and IDT Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

ATNI vs IDT, at a glance
Metric ATNI IDT
Revenue$728.0M$1.2B
Net income$-14.9M$76.1M
Gross margin··
Net margin−3.2%·
Return on equity−3.2%27.6%
Diluted EPS−$1.38$3.01
Dividend / share$1.07$0.22
Payout ratio−105.1%7.3%
Free cash flow$43.9M$106.3M
Equity$444.3M$305.1M
Net debt / equity1.04×·
Current ratio1.25×1.78×
Revenue CAGR 5y9.8%−1.8%
Profit CAGR 5y·28.8%

IDT bills 1.7× the revenue of ATNI, and ATNI closed the last reported year at a loss.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

ATNI vs IDT, revenue by year
Fiscal year ATNI IDT
FY2025$728.0M$1.2B
FY2024$729.1M$1.2B
FY2023$762.2M$1.2B
FY2022$725.7M$1.4B
FY2021$602.7M$1.4B
FY2020$455.4M$1.3B
FY2019$438.7M$1.4B
FY2018$451.2M$1.5B
FY2017$481.2M$1.5B
FY2016$457.0M$1.5B
Net income by year

Bottom line

ATNI vs IDT, net income by year
Fiscal year ATNI IDT
FY2025$-14.9M$76.1M
FY2024$-26.4M$64.5M
FY2023$-14.5M$40.5M
FY2022$-7.6M$27.0M
FY2021$-20.8M$96.5M
FY2020$-708,000$21.4M
FY2019$2.0M$134,000
FY2018$34.9M$4.2M
FY2017$48.9M$8.2M
FY2016$24.2M$23.5M
Revenue gap over time

16 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$503,520,000IDT
FY2024−$476,703,000IDT
FY2023−$476,638,000IDT
FY2022−$638,312,000IDT
FY2021−$844,283,000IDT
FY2020−$890,325,000IDT
FY2019−$970,450,000IDT
FY2018−$1,096,288,000IDT
FY2017−$1,020,536,000IDT
FY2016−$1,039,258,000IDT
FY2015−$1,241,408,000IDT
FY2014−$1,315,194,000IDT
FY2013−$1,327,782,000IDT
FY2012−$1,228,487,000IDT
FY2011−$1,088,609,000IDT
FY2010−$574,433,000IDT

IDT has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 16 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

16 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

IDT's return on equity has been more volatile than ATNI's over the 3 comparable fiscal years — 2.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.1.

3 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

IDT led in return on equity in every one of the 3 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

3 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages