AU vs CLF
AngloGold Ashanti PLC and Cleveland-cliffs Inc., side by side — 5 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | AU | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.9B | $18.6B |
| Net income | $3.2B | $-1.5B |
| Gross margin | 49.2% | −4.6% |
| Net margin | 32.1% | −7.7% |
| Return on equity | · | −23.2% |
| Diluted EPS | $5.18 | −$2.91 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | · | $-1.0B |
| Equity | $8.1B | $6.1B |
| Net debt / equity | −0.11× | 1.18× |
| Current ratio | 2.87× | 1.95× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | · | 28.3% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
CLF bills 1.9× the revenue of AU, and CLF closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
5 years side by side
| Fiscal year | AU | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $9.9B | $18.6B |
| FY2024 | $5.8B | $19.2B |
| FY2023 | $4.6B | $22.0B |
| FY2022 | $4.5B | $23.0B |
| FY2021 | $4.0B | $20.4B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | AU | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $3.2B | $-1.5B |
| FY2024 | $1.0B | $-760.0M |
| FY2023 | $-222.0M | $385.0M |
| FY2022 | $251.0M | $1.3B |
| FY2021 | $638.0M | $3.0B |
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$8,717,000,000 | CLF |
| FY2024 | −$13,392,000,000 | CLF |
| FY2023 | −$17,414,000,000 | CLF |
| FY2022 | −$18,488,000,000 | CLF |
| FY2021 | −$16,415,000,000 | CLF |
CLF has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 5 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
5 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +39.8 pp | AU |
| FY2024 | +21.8 pp | AU |
| FY2023 | −6.8 pp | CLF |
| FY2022 | −0.4 pp | CLF |
| FY2021 | +1.0 pp | AU |
The higher net margin has changed hands between AU and CLF over this period.
5 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
AU's net margin has been more volatile than CLF's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 12.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.8.
5 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between AU and CLF over these 5 fiscal years — AU led in 3 and CLF in 2.
5 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CLF's return on equity has been more volatile than AU's over the 3 comparable fiscal years — 32.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 8.8.
3 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
CLF led in return on equity in every one of the 3 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
3 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.