Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / BABA VS KRKR

BABA vs KRKR

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and 36Kr Holdings Inc., side by side — 9 fiscal years reported in CNY, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

BABA vs KRKR, at a glance
Metric BABA KRKR
RevenueCNY 1.0TCNY 227.9M
Net incomeCNY 103.6BCNY 11.4M
Gross margin39.8%57.7%
Net margin10.0%5.0%
Return on equity10.0%9.3%
Diluted EPSCNY 5.50CNY 0.01
Dividend / share··
Payout ratio32.6%·
Free cash flow·CNY 18.9M
EquityCNY 1.1TCNY 128.8M
Net debt / equity··
Current ratio1.28×1.21×
Revenue CAGR 5y7.4%−10.0%
Profit CAGR 5y−7.2%·

BABA bills 4491.0× the revenue of KRKR, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (10.0% against 5.0%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

9 years side by side

BABA vs KRKR, revenue by year
Fiscal year BABA KRKR
FY2025CNY 1.0TCNY 227.9M
FY2024CNY 996.3BCNY 231.1M
FY2023CNY 941.2BCNY 340.2M
FY2022CNY 868.7BCNY 322.5M
FY2021CNY 853.1BCNY 316.8M
FY2020CNY 717.3BCNY 386.8M
FY2019CNY 509.7BCNY 655.6M
FY2018CNY 376.8BCNY 299.1M
FY2017CNY 250.3BCNY 120.5M
Net income by year

Bottom line

BABA vs KRKR, net income by year
Fiscal year BABA KRKR
FY2025CNY 103.6BCNY 11.4M
FY2024CNY 130.1BCNY -140.8M
FY2023CNY 80.0BCNY -89.2M
FY2022CNY 72.8BCNY 22.6M
FY2021CNY 62.2BCNY -90.6M
FY2020CNY 150.6BCNY -279.3M
FY2019CNY 149.4BCNY -25.9M
FY2018CNY 87.9BCNY 40.5M
FY2017CNY 64.1BCNY 7.9M
Revenue gap over time

9 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+CNY 1,023,442,063,000BABA
FY2024+CNY 996,115,930,000BABA
FY2023+CNY 940,827,815,000BABA
FY2022+CNY 868,364,503,000BABA
FY2021+CNY 852,745,221,000BABA
FY2020+CNY 716,902,236,000BABA
FY2019+CNY 509,055,394,000BABA
FY2018+CNY 376,544,907,000BABA
FY2017+CNY 250,145,493,000BABA

BABA has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 9 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

9 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

9 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+5.0 ppBABA
FY2024+73.6 ppBABA
FY2023+33.8 ppBABA
FY2022+0.5 ppBABA
FY2021+34.1 ppBABA
FY2020+92.2 ppBABA
FY2019+31.5 ppBABA
FY2018+7.7 ppBABA
FY2017+18.0 ppBABA

BABA has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 9 fiscal years.

9 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

KRKR's net margin has been more volatile than BABA's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 29.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.8.

9 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

BABA led in net margin in every one of the 9 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

9 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

KRKR's return on equity has been more volatile than BABA's over the 6 comparable fiscal years — 30.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.9.

6 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

BABA led in return on equity in every one of the 6 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

6 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages