Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / BCO VS CHRW

BCO vs CHRW

Brinks Co. and C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

BCO vs CHRW, at a glance
Metric BCO CHRW
Revenue$5.3B$16.2B
Net income$199.7M$587.1M
Gross margin25.8%·
Net margin4.0%3.6%
Return on equity86.3%32.9%
Diluted EPS$4.69$4.83
Dividend / share$1.01$2.49
Payout ratio21.2%51.3%
Free cash flow$436.4M$894.9M
Equity$277.7M$1.8B
Net debt / equity8.09×0.50×
Current ratio1.51×1.53×
Revenue CAGR 5y7.3%0.0%
Profit CAGR 5y65.7%3.0%

CHRW bills 3.1× the revenue of BCO, and BCO keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (4.0% against 3.6%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

BCO vs CHRW, revenue by year
Fiscal year BCO CHRW
FY2025$5.3B$16.2B
FY2024$5.0B$17.7B
FY2023$4.9B$17.6B
FY2022$4.5B$24.7B
FY2021$4.2B$23.1B
FY2020$3.7B$16.2B
FY2019$3.7B$15.3B
FY2018$3.5B$16.6B
FY2017$3.3B$14.9B
FY2016$3.0B$13.1B
Net income by year

Bottom line

BCO vs CHRW, net income by year
Fiscal year BCO CHRW
FY2025$199.7M$587.1M
FY2024$162.9M$465.7M
FY2023$87.7M$325.1M
FY2022$170.6M$940.5M
FY2021$105.2M$844.2M
FY2020$16.0M$506.4M
FY2019$29.0M$577.0M
FY2018$-33.3M$664.5M
FY2017$16.7M$504.9M
FY2016$34.5M$513.4M
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$10,971,563,000CHRW
FY2024−$12,713,056,000CHRW
FY2023−$12,721,843,000CHRW
FY2022−$20,161,125,000CHRW
FY2021−$18,901,938,000CHRW
FY2020−$12,516,206,000CHRW
FY2019−$11,626,308,000CHRW
FY2018−$13,142,272,000CHRW
FY2017−$11,522,380,000CHRW
FY2016−$10,123,813,000CHRW
FY2015−$10,414,684,000CHRW
FY2014−$9,907,767,000CHRW
FY2013−$8,973,476,000CHRW
FY2012−$7,781,513,000CHRW
FY2011−$6,673,446,000CHRW
FY2010−$6,298,105,000CHRW
FY2009−$4,442,189,000CHRW
FY2008−$5,415,114,000CHRW

CHRW has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 18 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+0.4 ppBCO
FY2024+0.9 ppBCO
FY2023+0.2 ppBCO
FY2022+0.2 ppBCO
FY2021−0.9 ppCHRW
FY2020−2.5 ppCHRW
FY2019−2.9 ppCHRW
FY2018−4.8 ppCHRW
FY2017−2.7 ppCHRW
FY2016−2.4 ppCHRW
FY2015−4.7 ppCHRW
FY2014−6.6 ppCHRW
FY2013−1.1 ppCHRW
FY2012−2.2 ppCHRW
FY2011−1.5 ppCHRW
FY2010−1.7 ppCHRW
FY2009+2.6 ppBCO
FY2008+2.9 ppBCO

The higher net margin has changed hands between BCO and CHRW over this period.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

BCO's net margin has been more volatile than CHRW's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 2.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 0.7.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between BCO and CHRW over these 18 fiscal years — BCO led in 6 and CHRW in 12.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

BCO's return on equity has been more volatile than CHRW's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 29.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.7.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between BCO and CHRW over these 17 fiscal years — BCO led in 5 and CHRW in 12.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages