Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / BKNG VS CHRW

BKNG vs CHRW

Booking Holdings Inc. and C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

BKNG vs CHRW, at a glance
Metric BKNG CHRW
Revenue$26.9B$16.2B
Net income$5.4B$587.1M
Gross margin··
Net margin·3.6%
Return on equity·32.9%
Diluted EPS$165.57$4.83
Dividend / share$9.60$2.49
Payout ratio23.1%51.3%
Free cash flow$9.1B$894.9M
Equity$-5.6B$1.8B
Net debt / equity·0.50×
Current ratio1.33×1.53×
Revenue CAGR 5y31.7%0.0%
Profit CAGR 5y146.8%3.0%

BKNG bills 1.7× the revenue of CHRW.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

BKNG vs CHRW, revenue by year
Fiscal year BKNG CHRW
FY2025$26.9B$16.2B
FY2024$23.7B$17.7B
FY2023$21.4B$17.6B
FY2022$17.1B$24.7B
FY2021$11.0B$23.1B
FY2020$6.8B$16.2B
FY2019$15.1B$15.3B
FY2018$14.5B$16.6B
FY2017$12.7B$14.9B
FY2016$10.7B$13.1B
Net income by year

Bottom line

BKNG vs CHRW, net income by year
Fiscal year BKNG CHRW
FY2025$5.4B$587.1M
FY2024$5.9B$465.7M
FY2023$4.3B$325.1M
FY2022$3.1B$940.5M
FY2021$1.2B$844.2M
FY2020$59.0M$506.4M
FY2019$4.9B$577.0M
FY2018$4.0B$664.5M
FY2017$2.3B$504.9M
FY2016$2.1B$513.4M
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$10,684,237,000BKNG
FY2024+$6,014,044,000BKNG
FY2023+$3,768,557,000BKNG
FY2022−$7,606,625,000CHRW
FY2021−$12,144,138,000CHRW
FY2020−$9,411,106,000CHRW
FY2019−$243,508,000CHRW
FY2018−$2,104,172,000CHRW
FY2017−$2,188,380,000CHRW
FY2016−$2,401,413,000CHRW
FY2015−$4,252,097,000CHRW
FY2014−$5,028,096,000CHRW
FY2013−$5,958,770,000CHRW
FY2012−$6,098,157,000CHRW
FY2011−$5,980,736,000CHRW
FY2010−$6,189,400,000CHRW
FY2009−$5,238,977,000CHRW
FY2008−$6,693,808,000CHRW

The higher-revenue side has changed between BKNG and CHRW over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

8 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2015+23.9 ppBKNG
FY2014+25.3 ppBKNG
FY2013+24.6 ppBKNG
FY2012+21.8 ppBKNG
FY2011+20.1 ppBKNG
FY2010+12.9 ppBKNG
FY2009+16.2 ppBKNG
FY2008+5.7 ppBKNG

BKNG has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 8 fiscal years.

8 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

BKNG's net margin has been more volatile than CHRW's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 6.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 0.6.

8 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

BKNG led in net margin in every one of the 8 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

8 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

BKNG's return on equity has been more volatile than CHRW's over the 15 comparable fiscal years — 16.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 6.8.

15 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between BKNG and CHRW over these 15 fiscal years — BKNG led in 6 and CHRW in 9.

15 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages