Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CCK VS SNA

CCK vs SNA

Crown Holdings, Inc. and Snap-on Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CCK vs SNA, at a glance
Metric CCK SNA
Revenue$12.4B$5.2B
Net income$738.0M$1.0B
Gross margin22.0%·
Net margin7.1%20.2%
Return on equity25.6%18.0%
Diluted EPS$6.38$19.19
Dividend / share$1.04$8.86
Payout ratio16.3%45.5%
Free cash flow$1.1B·
Equity$3.0B$5.9B
Net debt / equity1.71×−0.07×
Current ratio1.03×4.79×
Revenue CAGR 5y5.7%5.5%
Profit CAGR 5y5.0%10.2%

CCK bills 2.4× the revenue of SNA, and SNA keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (20.2% against 7.1%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

CCK vs SNA, revenue by year
Fiscal year CCK SNA
FY2025$12.4B$5.2B
FY2024$11.8B$5.1B
FY2023$12.0B$5.1B
FY2022$12.9B$4.8B
FY2021$11.4B$4.6B
FY2020$9.4B$3.9B
FY2019$9.6B$4.1B
FY2018$11.2B$4.1B
FY2017$8.7B$4.0B
FY2016$8.3B$3.7B
Net income by year

Bottom line

CCK vs SNA, net income by year
Fiscal year CCK SNA
FY2025$738.0M$1.0B
FY2024$424.0M$1.0B
FY2023$450.0M$1.0B
FY2022$727.0M$911.7M
FY2021$-560.0M$820.5M
FY2020$579.0M$627.0M
FY2019$510.0M$693.5M
FY2018$439.0M$679.9M
FY2017$323.0M$557.7M
FY2016$496.0M$546.4M
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$7,208,900,000CCK
FY2024+$6,692,600,000CCK
FY2023+$6,901,700,000CCK
FY2022+$8,100,500,000CCK
FY2021+$6,792,300,000CCK
FY2020+$5,449,800,000CCK
FY2019+$5,491,300,000CCK
FY2018+$7,080,600,000CCK
FY2017+$4,697,700,000CCK
FY2016+$4,572,200,000CCK
FY2015+$5,409,200,000CCK
FY2014+$5,819,300,000CCK
FY2013+$5,599,500,000CCK
FY2012+$5,532,100,000CCK
FY2011−$2,462,200,000SNA
FY2010+$5,321,800,000CCK
FY2009+$5,575,500,000CCK
FY2008+$5,451,700,000CCK

The higher-revenue side has changed between CCK and SNA over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−13.1 ppSNA
FY2024−16.2 ppSNA
FY2023−15.4 ppSNA
FY2022−12.7 ppSNA
FY2021−21.9 ppSNA
FY2020−9.1 ppSNA
FY2019−10.9 ppSNA
FY2018−12.4 ppSNA
FY2017−9.4 ppSNA
FY2016−8.0 ppSNA
FY2015−9.4 ppSNA
FY2014−7.9 ppSNA
FY2013−6.8 ppSNA
FY2012−2.9 ppSNA
FY2011+91.1 ppCCK
FY2010−1.7 ppSNA
FY2009−0.4 ppSNA
FY2008−4.6 ppSNA

The higher net margin has changed hands between CCK and SNA over this period.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CCK's net margin has been more volatile than SNA's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 22.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.5.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between CCK and SNA over these 18 fiscal years — CCK led in 1 and SNA in 17.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CCK's return on equity has been more volatile than SNA's over the 10 comparable fiscal years — 60.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.5.

10 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between CCK and SNA over these 10 fiscal years — CCK led in 7 and SNA in 3.

10 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages