CDTG vs SRE
CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Ltd. and Sempra, side by side — 5 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | CDTG | SRE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.2M | $13.7B |
| Net income | $-10.2M | $1.8B |
| Gross margin | 41.5% | · |
| Net margin | −56.9% | 15.1% |
| Return on equity | −30.0% | 5.8% |
| Diluted EPS | −$0.84 | $2.75 |
| Dividend / share | · | $2.58 |
| Payout ratio | · | 87.3% |
| Free cash flow | $-1.5M | $-6.0B |
| Equity | $30.6M | $31.6B |
| Net debt / equity | · | 1.05× |
| Current ratio | 1.46× | 1.59× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | · | 3.8% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
SRE bills 751.8× the revenue of CDTG, and CDTG closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
5 years side by side
| Fiscal year | CDTG | SRE |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $18.2M | $13.7B |
| FY2024 | $29.8M | $13.2B |
| FY2023 | $34.2M | $16.7B |
| FY2022 | $28.8M | $14.4B |
| FY2021 | $23.6M | $12.9B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | CDTG | SRE |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-10.2M | $1.8B |
| FY2024 | $1.5M | $2.9B |
| FY2023 | $7.4M | $3.1B |
| FY2022 | $5.8M | $2.1B |
| FY2021 | $6.8M | $1.3B |
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$13,683,774,181 | SRE |
| FY2024 | −$13,155,234,795 | SRE |
| FY2023 | −$16,685,790,081 | SRE |
| FY2022 | −$14,410,150,638 | SRE |
| FY2021 | −$12,833,443,180 | SRE |
SRE has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 5 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
5 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −72.0 pp | SRE |
| FY2024 | −21.8 pp | SRE |
| FY2023 | −1.1 pp | SRE |
| FY2022 | +2.3 pp | CDTG |
| FY2021 | +16.5 pp | CDTG |
The higher net margin has changed hands between CDTG and SRE over this period.
5 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CDTG's net margin has been more volatile than SRE's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 30.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.3.
5 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between CDTG and SRE over these 5 fiscal years — CDTG led in 2 and SRE in 3.
5 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CDTG's return on equity has been more volatile than SRE's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 22.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.2.
5 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between CDTG and SRE over these 5 fiscal years — CDTG led in 3 and SRE in 2.
5 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.