CLVT vs RNG
Clarivate PLC and RingCentral, Inc., side by side — 9 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | CLVT | RNG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5B | $2.5B |
| Net income | $-201.1M | $43.4M |
| Gross margin | 66.0% | 71.2% |
| Net margin | −8.2% | 1.7% |
| Return on equity | −4.0% | · |
| Diluted EPS | −$0.30 | $0.48 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | −0.0% | · |
| Free cash flow | $365.3M | $587.3M |
| Equity | $4.8B | $-588.1M |
| Net debt / equity | 0.82× | · |
| Current ratio | 0.84× | 0.63× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 14.4% | 16.3% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
CLVT and RNG book revenue within 15% of each other, and CLVT closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
9 years side by side
| Fiscal year | CLVT | RNG |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $2.5B | $2.5B |
| FY2024 | $2.6B | $2.4B |
| FY2023 | $2.6B | $2.2B |
| FY2022 | $2.7B | $2.0B |
| FY2021 | $1.9B | $1.6B |
| FY2020 | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| FY2019 | $974.3M | $902.9M |
| FY2018 | $968.5M | $673.6M |
| FY2017 | $917.6M | $503.6M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | CLVT | RNG |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-201.1M | $43.4M |
| FY2024 | $-636.7M | $-58.3M |
| FY2023 | $-911.2M | $-165.2M |
| FY2022 | $-4.0B | $-879.2M |
| FY2021 | $-270.5M | $-376.2M |
| FY2020 | $-350.6M | $-83.0M |
| FY2019 | $-258.6M | $-53.6M |
| FY2018 | $-242.2M | $-26.2M |
| FY2017 | $-263.9M | $-4.2M |
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$59,942,000 | RNG |
| FY2024 | +$156,305,000 | CLVT |
| FY2023 | +$426,371,000 | CLVT |
| FY2022 | +$671,470,000 | CLVT |
| FY2021 | +$282,146,000 | CLVT |
| FY2020 | +$70,443,000 | CLVT |
| FY2019 | +$71,487,000 | CLVT |
| FY2018 | +$294,844,000 | CLVT |
| FY2017 | +$414,017,000 | CLVT |
The higher-revenue side has changed between CLVT and RNG over this period. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
9 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −9.9 pp | RNG |
| FY2024 | −22.5 pp | RNG |
| FY2023 | −27.2 pp | RNG |
| FY2022 | −104.7 pp | RNG |
| FY2021 | +9.2 pp | CLVT |
| FY2020 | −20.9 pp | RNG |
| FY2019 | −20.6 pp | RNG |
| FY2018 | −21.1 pp | RNG |
| FY2017 | −27.9 pp | RNG |
The higher net margin has changed hands between CLVT and RNG over this period.
9 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CLVT's net margin has been more volatile than RNG's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 40.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 13.8.
9 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between CLVT and RNG over these 9 fiscal years — CLVT led in 1 and RNG in 8.
9 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
RNG's return on equity has been more volatile than CLVT's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 43.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 8.2.
5 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between CLVT and RNG over these 5 fiscal years — CLVT led in 2 and RNG in 3.
5 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.