CNR vs HCC
Core Natural Resources, Inc. and Warrior MET Coal, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | CNR | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.2B | $1.3B |
| Net income | $-153.2M | $57.0M |
| Gross margin | 14.9% | 25.0% |
| Net margin | −3.7% | 4.4% |
| Return on equity | −5.8% | 2.7% |
| Diluted EPS | −$2.98 | $1.08 |
| Dividend / share | $0.40 | $0.32 |
| Payout ratio | −17.1% | 31.3% |
| Free cash flow | $21.2M | · |
| Equity | $3.7B | $2.1B |
| Net debt / equity | −0.01× | −0.07× |
| Current ratio | 1.60× | 3.19× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 32.5% | 10.8% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
CNR bills 3.2× the revenue of HCC, and CNR closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | CNR | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $4.2B | $1.3B |
| FY2024 | $2.2B | $1.5B |
| FY2023 | $2.5B | $1.7B |
| FY2022 | $2.3B | $1.7B |
| FY2021 | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| FY2020 | $1.0B | $782.7M |
| FY2019 | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| FY2018 | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| FY2017 | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| FY2016 | $1.2B | $297.6M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | CNR | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-153.2M | $57.0M |
| FY2024 | $286.4M | $250.6M |
| FY2023 | $655.9M | $478.6M |
| FY2022 | $467.0M | $641.3M |
| FY2021 | $34.1M | $150.9M |
| FY2020 | $-9.8M | $-35.8M |
| FY2019 | $76.0M | $301.7M |
| FY2018 | $153.0M | $696.8M |
| FY2017 | $67.6M | $455.0M |
| FY2016 | $41.5M | $-49.7M |
10 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$2,854,732,000 | CNR |
| FY2024 | +$639,186,000 | CNR |
| FY2023 | +$830,010,000 | CNR |
| FY2022 | +$541,280,000 | CNR |
| FY2021 | +$201,818,000 | CNR |
| FY2020 | +$238,905,000 | CNR |
| FY2019 | +$162,594,000 | CNR |
| FY2018 | +$154,008,000 | CNR |
| FY2017 | +$242,811,000 | CNR |
| FY2016 | +$933,228,000 | CNR |
CNR has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 10 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
10 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
10 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −8.0 pp | HCC |
| FY2024 | −3.2 pp | HCC |
| FY2023 | −2.4 pp | HCC |
| FY2022 | −16.4 pp | HCC |
| FY2021 | −11.5 pp | HCC |
| FY2020 | +3.3 pp | CNR |
| FY2019 | −17.2 pp | HCC |
| FY2018 | −38.9 pp | HCC |
| FY2017 | −33.1 pp | HCC |
| FY2016 | +20.8 pp | CNR |
The higher net margin has changed hands between CNR and HCC over this period.
10 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
HCC's net margin has been more volatile than CNR's over the 10 comparable fiscal years — 19.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 8.9.
10 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between CNR and HCC over these 10 fiscal years — CNR led in 2 and HCC in 8.
10 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
HCC's return on equity has been more volatile than CNR's over the 10 comparable fiscal years — 39.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 21.1.
10 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between CNR and HCC over these 10 fiscal years — CNR led in 4 and HCC in 6.
10 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.