CNR vs METC
Core Natural Resources, Inc. and Ramaco Resources, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | CNR | METC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.2B | $536.6M |
| Net income | $-153.2M | $-51.4M |
| Gross margin | 14.9% | 15.5% |
| Net margin | −3.7% | −9.6% |
| Return on equity | −5.8% | −12.2% |
| Diluted EPS | −$2.98 | −$0.99 |
| Dividend / share | $0.40 | · |
| Payout ratio | −17.1% | −8.4% |
| Free cash flow | $21.2M | · |
| Equity | $3.7B | $483.6M |
| Net debt / equity | −0.01× | 0.06× |
| Current ratio | 1.60× | 5.46× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 32.5% | 26.0% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
CNR bills 7.8× the revenue of METC, and both closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | CNR | METC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $4.2B | $536.6M |
| FY2024 | $2.2B | $666.3M |
| FY2023 | $2.5B | $693.5M |
| FY2022 | $2.3B | $565.7M |
| FY2021 | $1.3B | $283.4M |
| FY2020 | $1.0B | $168.9M |
| FY2019 | $1.4B | $168.9M |
| FY2018 | $1.5B | $227.6M |
| FY2017 | $1.4B | $61.0M |
| FY2016 | $1.2B | $5.2M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | CNR | METC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-153.2M | $-51.4M |
| FY2024 | $286.4M | $11.2M |
| FY2023 | $655.9M | $82.3M |
| FY2022 | $467.0M | $116.0M |
| FY2021 | $34.1M | $39.8M |
| FY2020 | $-9.8M | $-4.9M |
| FY2019 | $76.0M | $24.9M |
| FY2018 | $153.0M | $25.1M |
| FY2017 | $67.6M | $-15.4M |
| FY2016 | $41.5M | $-7.5M |
10 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$3,628,157,000 | CNR |
| FY2024 | +$1,498,111,000 | CNR |
| FY2023 | +$1,813,111,000 | CNR |
| FY2022 | +$1,714,330,000 | CNR |
| FY2021 | +$977,640,000 | CNR |
| FY2020 | +$852,728,000 | CNR |
| FY2019 | +$1,261,988,000 | CNR |
| FY2018 | +$1,304,441,000 | CNR |
| FY2017 | +$1,350,867,000 | CNR |
| FY2016 | +$1,225,646,000 | CNR |
CNR has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 10 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
10 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
10 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +5.9 pp | CNR |
| FY2024 | +11.6 pp | CNR |
| FY2023 | +14.3 pp | CNR |
| FY2022 | −0.0 pp | METC |
| FY2021 | −11.3 pp | METC |
| FY2020 | +1.6 pp | CNR |
| FY2019 | −8.2 pp | METC |
| FY2018 | +0.7 pp | CNR |
| FY2017 | +31.1 pp | CNR |
| FY2016 | +148.2 pp | CNR |
The higher net margin has changed hands between CNR and METC over this period.
10 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
METC's net margin has been more volatile than CNR's over the 10 comparable fiscal years — 46.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 8.9.
10 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between CNR and METC over these 10 fiscal years — CNR led in 7 and METC in 3.
10 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CNR's return on equity has been more volatile than METC's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 22.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 16.6.
8 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between CNR and METC over these 8 fiscal years — CNR led in 7 and METC in 1.
8 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.