Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / DLB VS IDCC

DLB vs IDCC

Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and InterDigital, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

DLB vs IDCC, at a glance
Metric DLB IDCC
Revenue$1.3B$834.0M
Net income$255.0M$406.6M
Gross margin88.1%·
Net margin19.0%48.8%
Return on equity10.0%41.5%
Diluted EPS$2.62$11.80
Dividend / share$1.32$2.60
Payout ratio49.6%14.9%
Free cash flow$435.9M$528.6M
Equity$2.6B$1.1B
Net debt / equity·−0.24×
Current ratio3.17×1.84×
Revenue CAGR 5y3.0%18.4%
Profit CAGR 5y2.0%55.4%

DLB bills 1.6× the revenue of IDCC, and IDCC keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (48.8% against 19.0%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

DLB vs IDCC, revenue by year
Fiscal year DLB IDCC
FY2025$1.3B$834.0M
FY2024$1.3B$868.5M
FY2023$1.3B$549.6M
FY2022$1.3B$457.8M
FY2021$1.3B$425.4M
FY2020$1.2B$359.0M
FY2019$1.2B$318.9M
FY2018$1.1B$307.4M
FY2017$1.1B$532.9M
FY2016$1.0B$665.9M
Net income by year

Bottom line

DLB vs IDCC, net income by year
Fiscal year DLB IDCC
FY2025$255.0M$406.6M
FY2024$261.8M$358.6M
FY2023$200.7M$214.1M
FY2022$184.1M$93.7M
FY2021$310.2M$55.3M
FY2020$231.4M$44.8M
FY2019$255.2M$20.9M
FY2018$41.7M$65.0M
FY2017$206.5M$176.2M
FY2016$185.9M$309.0M
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$515,115,000DLB
FY2024+$405,205,000DLB
FY2023+$750,156,000DLB
FY2022+$795,999,000DLB
FY2021+$855,847,000DLB
FY2020+$802,801,000DLB
FY2019+$922,696,000DLB
FY2018+$747,196,000DLB
FY2017+$547,239,000DLB
FY2016+$359,884,000DLB
FY2015+$529,203,000DLB
FY2014+$544,355,000DLB
FY2013+$584,313,000DLB
FY2012+$269,951,000DLB
FY2011+$659,323,000DLB
FY2010+$528,168,000DLB
FY2009+$422,099,000DLB
FY2008+$411,762,000DLB

DLB has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 18 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−29.7 ppIDCC
FY2024−20.5 ppIDCC
FY2023−22.9 ppIDCC
FY2022−5.4 ppIDCC
FY2021+14.9 ppDLB
FY2020+9.4 ppDLB
FY2019+15.9 ppDLB
FY2018−15.3 ppIDCC
FY2017−12.9 ppIDCC
FY2016−27.7 ppIDCC
FY2015−8.1 ppIDCC
FY2014−3.4 ppIDCC
FY2013+9.2 ppDLB
FY2012−12.6 ppIDCC
FY2011+2.7 ppDLB
FY2010−8.3 ppIDCC
FY2009+4.6 ppDLB
FY2008+19.9 ppDLB

The higher net margin has changed hands between DLB and IDCC over this period.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

IDCC's net margin has been more volatile than DLB's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 13.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.2.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between DLB and IDCC over these 18 fiscal years — DLB led in 7 and IDCC in 11.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

IDCC's return on equity has been more volatile than DLB's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 20.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.7.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between DLB and IDCC over these 18 fiscal years — DLB led in 4 and IDCC in 14.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages