Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / DVA VS FMS

DVA vs FMS

DaVita Inc. and Fresenius Medical Care AG, side by side — 4 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

DVA vs FMS, at a glance
Metric DVA FMS
Revenue$13.6B$14.6B
Net income$746.8M$1.1B
Gross margin·32.4%
Net margin7.9%8.6%
Return on equity·12.2%
Diluted EPS$9.84$3.65
Dividend / share··
Payout ratio0.0%26.7%
Free cash flow$1.3B$1.3B
Equity$-651.1M$9.2B
Net debt / equity·0.78×
Current ratio1.29×1.77×
Revenue CAGR 5y3.4%6.6%
Profit CAGR 5y−0.7%6.3%

DVA and FMS book revenue within 15% of each other, and FMS keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (8.6% against 7.9%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

4 years side by side

DVA vs FMS, revenue by year
Fiscal year DVA FMS
FY2013$11.8B$14.6B
FY2012$8.2B$13.8B
FY2011$6.7B$12.6B
FY2010$6.2B$11.8B
Net income by year

Bottom line

DVA vs FMS, net income by year
Fiscal year DVA FMS
FY2013$633.4M$1.1B
FY2012$536.0M$1.2B
FY2011$478.0M$1.1B
FY2010$405.7M$978.5M
Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

DVA's net margin has been more volatile than FMS's over the 4 comparable fiscal years — 0.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 0.4.

4 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

FMS led in net margin in every one of the 4 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

4 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

DVA's return on equity has been more volatile than FMS's over the 6 comparable fiscal years — 2.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 0.7.

6 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

DVA led in return on equity in every one of the 6 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

6 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages