DY vs KBR
Dycom Industries Inc. and Kbr, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | DY | KBR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.5B | $7.8B |
| Net income | $281.2M | $415.0M |
| Gross margin | 20.6% | 14.8% |
| Net margin | 5.1% | 5.2% |
| Return on equity | 18.2% | 28.1% |
| Diluted EPS | $9.56 | $3.21 |
| Dividend / share | · | $0.66 |
| Payout ratio | · | 20.2% |
| Free cash flow | $401.7M | $515.0M |
| Equity | $1.9B | $1.5B |
| Net debt / equity | 1.13× | 1.39× |
| Current ratio | 2.74× | 1.22× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 11.6% | 6.2% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 52.3% | · |
KBR bills 1.4× the revenue of DY, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (5.2% against 5.1%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | DY | KBR |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $5.5B | $7.8B |
| FY2024 | $4.7B | $7.7B |
| FY2023 | $4.2B | $7.0B |
| FY2022 | $3.8B | $6.6B |
| FY2021 | $3.1B | $7.3B |
| FY2020 | $3.2B | $5.8B |
| FY2019 | $3.3B | $5.6B |
| FY2018 | $3.1B | $4.9B |
| FY2017 | $3.1B | $4.2B |
| FY2016 | $2.7B | $4.3B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | DY | KBR |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $281.2M | $415.0M |
| FY2024 | $233.4M | $375.0M |
| FY2023 | $218.9M | $-265.0M |
| FY2022 | $142.2M | $190.0M |
| FY2021 | $48.6M | $27.0M |
| FY2020 | $34.3M | $-63.0M |
| FY2019 | $57.2M | $202.0M |
| FY2018 | $62.9M | $281.0M |
| FY2017 | $157.2M | $432.0M |
| FY2016 | $128.7M | $-61.0M |
16 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$2,240,088,000 | KBR |
| FY2024 | −$3,007,986,000 | KBR |
| FY2023 | −$2,780,426,000 | KBR |
| FY2022 | −$2,755,538,000 | KBR |
| FY2021 | −$4,208,481,000 | KBR |
| FY2020 | −$2,567,835,000 | KBR |
| FY2019 | −$2,299,318,000 | KBR |
| FY2018 | −$1,785,300,000 | KBR |
| FY2017 | −$1,104,120,000 | KBR |
| FY2016 | −$1,595,458,000 | KBR |
| FY2015 | −$3,073,688,000 | KBR |
| FY2014 | −$4,554,407,000 | KBR |
| FY2013 | −$5,605,388,000 | KBR |
| FY2012 | −$6,568,881,000 | KBR |
| FY2011 | −$8,067,132,000 | KBR |
| FY2010 | −$8,114,377,000 | KBR |
KBR has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 16 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
16 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
16 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −0.1 pp | KBR |
| FY2024 | +0.0 pp | DY |
| FY2023 | +9.0 pp | DY |
| FY2022 | +0.8 pp | DY |
| FY2021 | +1.1 pp | DY |
| FY2020 | +1.8 pp | DY |
| FY2019 | −2.0 pp | KBR |
| FY2018 | −4.3 pp | KBR |
| FY2017 | −5.4 pp | KBR |
| FY2016 | +6.0 pp | DY |
| FY2015 | −0.3 pp | KBR |
| FY2014 | +21.0 pp | DY |
| FY2013 | −0.2 pp | KBR |
| FY2012 | +0.7 pp | DY |
| FY2011 | −4.4 pp | KBR |
| FY2010 | −3.7 pp | KBR |
The higher net margin has changed hands between DY and KBR over this period.
16 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
KBR's net margin has been more volatile than DY's over the 16 comparable fiscal years — 6.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.6.
16 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between DY and KBR over these 16 fiscal years — DY led in 8 and KBR in 8.
16 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
KBR's return on equity has been more volatile than DY's over the 16 comparable fiscal years — 25.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.6.
16 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between DY and KBR over these 16 fiscal years — DY led in 8 and KBR in 8.
16 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.