Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / EBF VS QUAD

EBF vs QUAD

Ennis, Inc. and Quad/Graphics, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

EBF vs QUAD, at a glance
Metric EBF QUAD
Revenue$392.4M$2.4B
Net income$42.6M$27.0M
Gross margin30.7%21.6%
Net margin10.9%1.1%
Return on equity14.0%·
Diluted EPS$1.66$0.54
Dividend / share$1.00$0.30
Payout ratio60.8%53.3%
Free cash flow$41.0M$50.7M
Equity$308.7M$-59.5M
Net debt / equity··
Current ratio3.72×0.86×
Revenue CAGR 5y1.9%−3.8%
Profit CAGR 5y12.1%·

QUAD bills 6.2× the revenue of EBF, and EBF keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (10.9% against 1.1%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

EBF vs QUAD, revenue by year
Fiscal year EBF QUAD
FY2025$392.4M$2.4B
FY2024$394.6M$2.7B
FY2023$420.1M$3.0B
FY2022$431.8M$3.2B
FY2021$400.0M$3.0B
FY2020$358.0M$2.9B
FY2019$438.4M$3.9B
FY2018$400.8M$4.0B
FY2017$370.2M$4.0B
FY2016$356.9M$4.3B
Net income by year

Bottom line

EBF vs QUAD, net income by year
Fiscal year EBF QUAD
FY2025$42.6M$27.0M
FY2024$40.2M$-50.9M
FY2023$42.6M$-55.4M
FY2022$47.3M$9.3M
FY2021$29.0M$37.8M
FY2020$24.1M$-128.3M
FY2019$38.3M$-156.3M
FY2018$37.4M$8.5M
FY2017$32.9M$107.2M
FY2016$1.8M$44.9M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$2,027,497,000QUAD
FY2024−$2,277,582,000QUAD
FY2023−$2,537,591,000QUAD
FY2022−$2,785,163,000QUAD
FY2021−$2,560,386,000QUAD
FY2020−$2,571,627,000QUAD
FY2019−$3,484,988,000QUAD
FY2018−$3,585,018,000QUAD
FY2017−$3,581,029,000QUAD
FY2016−$3,972,612,000QUAD
FY2015−$4,211,154,000QUAD
FY2014−$4,397,221,000QUAD
FY2013−$4,253,458,000QUAD
FY2012−$3,560,494,000QUAD
FY2011−$3,807,586,000QUAD
FY2010−$2,635,801,000QUAD
FY2009−$1,270,762,000QUAD

QUAD has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+9.7 ppEBF
FY2024+12.1 ppEBF
FY2023+12.0 ppEBF
FY2022+10.7 ppEBF
FY2021+6.0 ppEBF
FY2020+11.1 ppEBF
FY2019+12.7 ppEBF
FY2018+9.1 ppEBF
FY2017+6.2 ppEBF
FY2016−0.5 ppQUAD
FY2015+23.2 ppEBF
FY2014−12.1 ppQUAD
FY2013+1.8 ppEBF
FY2012+2.5 ppEBF
FY2011+7.1 ppEBF
FY2010+16.0 ppEBF
FY2009+3.8 ppEBF

The higher net margin has changed hands between EBF and QUAD over this period.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

EBF's net margin has been more volatile than QUAD's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 5.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.2.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between EBF and QUAD over these 17 fiscal years — EBF led in 15 and QUAD in 2.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

QUAD's return on equity has been more volatile than EBF's over the 13 comparable fiscal years — 35.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.5.

13 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between EBF and QUAD over these 13 fiscal years — EBF led in 8 and QUAD in 5.

13 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages