Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / ECHO VS IRDM

ECHO vs IRDM

EchoStar Corp. and Iridium Communications Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

ECHO vs IRDM, at a glance
Metric ECHO IRDM
Revenue$15.0B$871.7M
Net income$-14.5B$114.4M
Gross margin37.1%·
Net margin−96.7%13.1%
Return on equity−111.7%22.0%
Diluted EPS−$50.41$1.06
Dividend / share··
Payout ratio·55.0%
Free cash flow$-1.1B$299.8M
Equity$5.8B$462.6M
Net debt / equity2.91×3.60×
Current ratio0.42×2.48×
Revenue CAGR 5y51.4%8.4%
Profit CAGR 5y··

ECHO bills 17.2× the revenue of IRDM, and ECHO closed the last reported year at a loss.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

ECHO vs IRDM, revenue by year
Fiscal year ECHO IRDM
FY2025$15.0B$871.7M
FY2024$15.8B$830.7M
FY2023$17.0B$790.7M
FY2022$18.6B$721.0M
FY2021$19.8B$614.5M
FY2020$1.9B$583.4M
FY2019$1.9B$560.4M
FY2018$1.8B$523.0M
FY2017$1.5B$448.0M
FY2016$1.8B$433.6M
Net income by year

Bottom line

ECHO vs IRDM, net income by year
Fiscal year ECHO IRDM
FY2025$-14.5B$114.4M
FY2024$-119.5M$112.8M
FY2023$-1.7B$15.4M
FY2022$2.5B$8.7M
FY2021$2.5B$-9.3M
FY2020$-51.9M$-56.1M
FY2019$-74.3M$-162.0M
FY2018$-38.6M$-13.4M
FY2017$392.6M$233.9M
FY2016$179.9M$111.0M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$14,133,330,000ECHO
FY2024+$14,994,834,000ECHO
FY2023+$16,224,875,000ECHO
FY2022+$17,913,212,000ECHO
FY2021+$19,204,178,000ECHO
FY2020+$1,304,468,000ECHO
FY2019+$1,325,637,000ECHO
FY2018+$1,239,630,000ECHO
FY2017+$1,077,109,000ECHO
FY2016+$1,376,826,000ECHO
FY2015+$1,437,479,000ECHO
FY2014+$3,037,021,000ECHO
FY2013+$2,899,803,000ECHO
FY2012+$2,738,184,000ECHO
FY2011+$2,377,124,000ECHO
FY2010+$2,002,196,000ECHO
FY2009+$1,827,570,000ECHO

ECHO has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−109.8 ppIRDM
FY2024−14.4 ppIRDM
FY2023−11.6 ppIRDM
FY2022+12.4 ppECHO
FY2021+14.2 ppECHO
FY2020+6.9 ppECHO
FY2019+25.0 ppECHO
FY2018+0.4 ppECHO
FY2017−26.4 ppIRDM
FY2016−15.6 ppIRDM
FY2015+6.3 ppECHO
FY2014−14.1 ppIRDM
FY2013−16.2 ppIRDM
FY2012−10.1 ppIRDM
FY2011−10.5 ppIRDM
FY2010+3.0 ppECHO
FY2009+74.7 ppECHO

The higher net margin has changed hands between ECHO and IRDM over this period.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

ECHO's net margin has been more volatile than IRDM's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 25.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 22.3.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between ECHO and IRDM over these 17 fiscal years — ECHO led in 8 and IRDM in 9.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

ECHO's return on equity has been more volatile than IRDM's over the 13 comparable fiscal years — 31.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 9.1.

13 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between ECHO and IRDM over these 13 fiscal years — ECHO led in 4 and IRDM in 9.

13 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages