FNCTF vs TEFOF
Orange and Telefonica S A, side by side — 9 fiscal years reported in EUR, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | FNCTF | TEFOF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | €44.1B | €41.3B |
| Net income | €2.4B | €-49.0M |
| Gross margin | · | · |
| Net margin | 6.6% | 0.5% |
| Return on equity | 7.7% | −0.2% |
| Diluted EPS | €0.85 | −€0.06 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | 76.3% | −3851.0% |
| Free cash flow | · | · |
| Equity | €31.8B | €19.3B |
| Net debt / equity | · | · |
| Current ratio | 0.83× | 0.87× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 1.3% | −3.1% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 4.5% | · |
FNCTF and TEFOF book revenue within 15% of each other, and TEFOF closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
9 years side by side
| Fiscal year | FNCTF | TEFOF |
|---|---|---|
| FY2023 | €44.1B | €40.7B |
| FY2022 | €43.5B | €40.0B |
| FY2021 | €42.5B | €39.3B |
| FY2020 | €42.3B | €43.1B |
| FY2019 | €42.2B | €48.4B |
| FY2018 | €41.4B | €48.7B |
| FY2017 | €40.9B | €52.0B |
| FY2016 | €40.7B | €52.0B |
| FY2015 | €40.2B | €54.9B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | FNCTF | TEFOF |
|---|---|---|
| FY2023 | €2.4B | €-892.0M |
| FY2022 | €2.1B | €2.0B |
| FY2021 | €233.0M | €8.1B |
| FY2020 | €4.8B | €1.6B |
| FY2019 | €3.0B | €1.1B |
| FY2018 | €2.0B | €3.3B |
| FY2017 | €1.8B | €3.1B |
| FY2016 | €2.8B | €2.4B |
| FY2015 | €2.7B | €616.0M |
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2023 | +€3,470,000,000 | FNCTF |
| FY2022 | +€3,478,000,000 | FNCTF |
| FY2021 | +€3,245,000,000 | FNCTF |
| FY2020 | −€806,000,000 | TEFOF |
| FY2019 | −€6,184,000,000 | TEFOF |
| FY2018 | −€7,312,000,000 | TEFOF |
| FY2017 | −€11,149,000,000 | TEFOF |
| FY2016 | −€11,328,000,000 | TEFOF |
| FY2015 | −€14,680,000,000 | TEFOF |
The higher-revenue side has changed between FNCTF and TEFOF over this period. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2023 | +8.0 pp | FNCTF |
| FY2022 | +0.2 pp | FNCTF |
| FY2021 | −25.5 pp | TEFOF |
| FY2020 | +7.4 pp | FNCTF |
| FY2019 | +4.2 pp | FNCTF |
| FY2018 | −2.9 pp | TEFOF |
| FY2017 | −1.5 pp | TEFOF |
| FY2016 | +3.1 pp | FNCTF |
| FY2015 | +6.0 pp | FNCTF |
The higher net margin has changed hands between FNCTF and TEFOF over this period.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
TEFOF's net margin has been more volatile than FNCTF's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 7.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.6.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between FNCTF and TEFOF over these 9 fiscal years — FNCTF led in 6 and TEFOF in 3.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
TEFOF's return on equity has been more volatile than FNCTF's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 14.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.7.
8 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between FNCTF and TEFOF over these 8 fiscal years — FNCTF led in 3 and TEFOF in 5.
8 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.