Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / FNMA VS NU

FNMA vs NU

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie MAE and Nu Holdings Ltd., side by side — 6 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

FNMA vs NU, at a glance
Metric FNMA NU
Revenue$29.0B$11.5B
Net income$14.4B$2.0B
Gross margin·45.6%
Net margin49.6%17.1%
Return on equity14.1%28.1%
Diluted EPS$0.00$0.40
Dividend / share··
Payout ratio··
Free cash flow··
Equity$109.0B$7.6B
Net debt / equity37.73×−0.98×
Current ratio··
Revenue CAGR 5y2.7%79.8%
Profit CAGR 5y4.0%·

FNMA bills 2.5× the revenue of NU, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (49.6% against 17.1%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

6 years side by side

FNMA vs NU, revenue by year
Fiscal year FNMA NU
FY2024$29.1B$11.5B
FY2023$29.0B$8.0B
FY2022$29.7B$4.8B
FY2021$29.9B$1.7B
FY2020$25.3B$737.1M
FY2019$21.9B$612.1M
Net income by year

Bottom line

FNMA vs NU, net income by year
Fiscal year FNMA NU
FY2024$17.0B$2.0B
FY2023$17.4B$1.0B
FY2022$12.9B$-364.6M
FY2021$22.2B$-165.0M
FY2020$11.8B$-171.5M
FY2019$14.2B$-92.5M
Revenue gap over time

6 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2024+$17,551,925,000FNMA
FY2023+$21,019,024,000FNMA
FY2022+$24,942,769,000FNMA
FY2021+$28,249,977,000FNMA
FY2020+$24,590,867,000FNMA
FY2019+$21,246,891,000FNMA

FNMA has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 6 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

6 of 12 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

6 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2024+41.3 ppFNMA
FY2023+47.1 ppFNMA
FY2022+51.1 ppFNMA
FY2021+83.8 ppFNMA
FY2020+69.9 ppFNMA
FY2019+79.9 ppFNMA

FNMA has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 6 fiscal years.

6 of 12 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

NU's net margin has been more volatile than FNMA's over the 6 comparable fiscal years — 14.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 10.4.

6 of 12 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

FNMA led in net margin in every one of the 6 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

6 of 12 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

FNMA's return on equity has been more volatile than NU's over the 6 comparable fiscal years — 40.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 20.3.

6 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between FNMA and NU over these 6 fiscal years — FNMA led in 5 and NU in 1.

6 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages