FXHO vs JKS
UTime Ltd. and JinkoSolar Holding Co. Ltd., side by side — 8 fiscal years reported in CNY, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | FXHO | JKS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | CNY 196.4M | CNY 65.5B |
| Net income | CNY -27.8M | CNY -4.4B |
| Gross margin | 1.0% | 2.2% |
| Net margin | −14.2% | −10.9% |
| Return on equity | · | −25.0% |
| Diluted EPS | · | −CNY 21.33 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | CNY -146.3M | CNY -2.1B |
| Equity | CNY 143.1M | CNY 15.7B |
| Net debt / equity | −1.76× | −0.59× |
| Current ratio | 1.41× | 1.25× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | −4.5% | 13.3% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
JKS bills 333.5× the revenue of FXHO, and both closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
8 years side by side
| Fiscal year | FXHO | JKS |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | CNY 196.4M | CNY 65.5B |
| FY2024 | CNY 251.0M | CNY 92.3B |
| FY2023 | CNY 172.2M | CNY 118.7B |
| FY2022 | CNY 197.6M | CNY 83.1B |
| FY2021 | CNY 275.5M | CNY 40.8B |
| FY2020 | CNY 246.9M | CNY 35.1B |
| FY2019 | CNY 193.1M | CNY 29.7B |
| FY2018 | CNY 238.1M | CNY 25.0B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | FXHO | JKS |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | CNY -27.8M | CNY -4.4B |
| FY2024 | CNY -670.1M | CNY 54.5M |
| FY2023 | CNY -60.9M | CNY 3.4B |
| FY2022 | CNY -87.6M | CNY 620.5M |
| FY2021 | CNY -38.8M | CNY 721.0M |
| FY2020 | CNY -16.6M | CNY 230.4M |
| FY2019 | CNY -21.7M | CNY 898.7M |
| FY2018 | CNY -11.9M | CNY 406.5M |
8 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −CNY 65,301,261,000 | JKS |
| FY2024 | −CNY 92,005,305,000 | JKS |
| FY2023 | −CNY 118,506,435,000 | JKS |
| FY2022 | −CNY 82,929,732,000 | JKS |
| FY2021 | −CNY 40,551,013,000 | JKS |
| FY2020 | −CNY 34,882,560,000 | JKS |
| FY2019 | −CNY 29,553,199,759 | JKS |
| FY2018 | −CNY 24,804,517,341 | JKS |
JKS has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 8 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
8 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
8 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −3.3 pp | JKS |
| FY2024 | −267.0 pp | JKS |
| FY2023 | −41.6 pp | JKS |
| FY2022 | −47.4 pp | JKS |
| FY2021 | −16.6 pp | JKS |
| FY2020 | −7.7 pp | JKS |
| FY2019 | −14.3 pp | JKS |
| FY2018 | −6.6 pp | JKS |
JKS has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 8 fiscal years.
8 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
FXHO's net margin has been more volatile than JKS's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 83.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.6.
8 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
JKS led in net margin in every one of the 8 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
8 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
FXHO's return on equity has been more volatile than JKS's over the 6 comparable fiscal years — 40.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.4.
6 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
JKS led in return on equity in every one of the 6 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
6 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.