GDDY vs OTEX
GoDaddy Inc. and Open Text Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | GDDY | OTEX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.0B | $5.2B |
| Net income | $875.0M | $643.0M |
| Gross margin | 63.6% | 73.7% |
| Net margin | 17.7% | 12.3% |
| Return on equity | 192.9% | 16.2% |
| Diluted EPS | $6.22 | $2.58 |
| Dividend / share | · | $1.10 |
| Payout ratio | · | 41.7% |
| Free cash flow | $1.6B | $807.5M |
| Equity | $215.1M | $4.0B |
| Net debt / equity | 12.55× | 1.20× |
| Current ratio | 0.61× | 0.81× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 8.3% | 9.2% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | 15.7% |
GDDY and OTEX book revenue within 15% of each other, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (17.7% against 12.3%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | GDDY | OTEX |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $5.0B | $5.2B |
| FY2024 | $4.6B | $5.2B |
| FY2023 | $4.3B | $5.8B |
| FY2022 | $4.1B | $4.5B |
| FY2021 | $3.8B | $3.5B |
| FY2020 | $3.3B | $3.4B |
| FY2019 | $3.0B | $3.1B |
| FY2018 | $2.7B | $2.9B |
| FY2017 | $2.2B | $2.8B |
| FY2016 | $1.8B | $2.3B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | GDDY | OTEX |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $875.0M | $643.0M |
| FY2024 | $936.9M | $435.9M |
| FY2023 | $1.4B | $465.1M |
| FY2022 | $352.2M | $150.4M |
| FY2021 | $242.3M | $397.1M |
| FY2020 | $-495.1M | $310.7M |
| FY2019 | $137.0M | $234.2M |
| FY2018 | $77.1M | $285.5M |
| FY2017 | $136.4M | $242.2M |
| FY2016 | $-16.5M | $1.0B |
13 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$295,301,000 | OTEX |
| FY2024 | −$595,205,000 | OTEX |
| FY2023 | −$1,515,477,000 | OTEX |
| FY2022 | −$393,680,000 | OTEX |
| FY2021 | +$321,856,000 | GDDY |
| FY2020 | −$69,415,000 | OTEX |
| FY2019 | −$121,636,000 | OTEX |
| FY2018 | −$208,655,000 | OTEX |
| FY2017 | −$583,341,000 | OTEX |
| FY2016 | −$443,157,000 | OTEX |
| FY2015 | −$216,928,000 | OTEX |
| FY2014 | −$464,617,000 | OTEX |
| FY2013 | −$493,899,000 | OTEX |
The higher-revenue side has changed between GDDY and OTEX over this period. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
13 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
13 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +5.4 pp | GDDY |
| FY2024 | +12.0 pp | GDDY |
| FY2023 | +24.3 pp | GDDY |
| FY2022 | +5.3 pp | GDDY |
| FY2021 | −5.0 pp | OTEX |
| FY2020 | −24.1 pp | OTEX |
| FY2019 | −2.9 pp | OTEX |
| FY2018 | −6.9 pp | OTEX |
| FY2017 | −2.3 pp | OTEX |
| FY2016 | −46.0 pp | OTEX |
| FY2015 | −23.1 pp | OTEX |
| FY2014 | −23.0 pp | OTEX |
| FY2013 | −31.1 pp | OTEX |
The higher net margin has changed hands between GDDY and OTEX over this period.
13 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
GDDY's net margin has been more volatile than OTEX's over the 13 comparable fiscal years — 13.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 9.7.
13 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between GDDY and OTEX over these 13 fiscal years — GDDY led in 4 and OTEX in 9.
13 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
GDDY's return on equity has been more volatile than OTEX's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 98.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 9.5.
8 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between GDDY and OTEX over these 8 fiscal years — GDDY led in 5 and OTEX in 3.
8 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.