LDOS vs OTEX
Leidos Holdings, Inc. and Open Text Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | LDOS | OTEX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.2B | $5.2B |
| Net income | $1.4B | $643.0M |
| Gross margin | 18.0% | 73.7% |
| Net margin | 8.5% | 12.3% |
| Return on equity | 31.0% | 16.2% |
| Diluted EPS | $11.14 | $2.58 |
| Dividend / share | $1.63 | $1.10 |
| Payout ratio | · | 41.7% |
| Free cash flow | $1.6B | $807.5M |
| Equity | $4.9B | $4.0B |
| Net debt / equity | 0.72× | 1.20× |
| Current ratio | 1.70× | 0.81× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 6.9% | 9.2% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 18.2% | 15.7% |
LDOS bills 3.3× the revenue of OTEX, and OTEX keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (12.3% against 8.5%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | LDOS | OTEX |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $17.2B | $5.2B |
| FY2024 | $16.7B | $5.2B |
| FY2023 | $15.4B | $5.8B |
| FY2022 | $14.4B | $4.5B |
| FY2021 | $13.7B | $3.5B |
| FY2020 | $12.3B | $3.4B |
| FY2019 | $11.1B | $3.1B |
| FY2018 | $10.2B | $2.9B |
| FY2017 | $10.2B | $2.8B |
| FY2016 | $7.0B | $2.3B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | LDOS | OTEX |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $1.4B | $643.0M |
| FY2024 | $1.3B | $435.9M |
| FY2023 | $199.0M | $465.1M |
| FY2022 | $685.0M | $150.4M |
| FY2021 | $753.0M | $397.1M |
| FY2020 | $628.0M | $310.7M |
| FY2019 | $667.0M | $234.2M |
| FY2018 | $581.0M | $285.5M |
| FY2017 | $366.0M | $242.2M |
| FY2016 | $244.0M | $1.0B |
17 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$11,927,599,000 | LDOS |
| FY2024 | +$11,493,595,000 | LDOS |
| FY2023 | +$9,668,423,000 | LDOS |
| FY2022 | +$9,911,020,000 | LDOS |
| FY2021 | +$10,243,156,000 | LDOS |
| FY2020 | +$8,910,885,000 | LDOS |
| FY2019 | +$7,984,264,000 | LDOS |
| FY2018 | +$7,325,245,000 | LDOS |
| FY2017 | +$7,354,759,000 | LDOS |
| FY2016 | +$4,751,943,000 | LDOS |
| FY2014 | +$3,211,083,000 | LDOS |
| FY2013 | +$4,130,301,000 | LDOS |
| FY2012 | +$5,085,664,000 | LDOS |
| FY2011 | +$4,628,527,000 | LDOS |
| FY2010 | +$9,764,697,000 | LDOS |
| FY2009 | +$9,667,977,000 | LDOS |
| FY2008 | +$9,284,335,000 | LDOS |
LDOS has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
17 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −3.7 pp | OTEX |
| FY2024 | −0.9 pp | OTEX |
| FY2023 | −6.7 pp | OTEX |
| FY2022 | +1.5 pp | LDOS |
| FY2021 | −5.8 pp | OTEX |
| FY2020 | −4.1 pp | OTEX |
| FY2019 | −1.5 pp | OTEX |
| FY2018 | −4.2 pp | OTEX |
| FY2017 | −5.0 pp | OTEX |
| FY2016 | −41.3 pp | OTEX |
| FY2014 | −19.0 pp | OTEX |
| FY2013 | −10.6 pp | OTEX |
| FY2012 | −2.8 pp | OTEX |
| FY2011 | −9.4 pp | OTEX |
| FY2010 | −6.2 pp | OTEX |
| FY2009 | −5.1 pp | OTEX |
| FY2008 | −2.8 pp | OTEX |
The higher net margin has changed hands between LDOS and OTEX over this period.
17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
OTEX's net margin has been more volatile than LDOS's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 8.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.3.
17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between LDOS and OTEX over these 17 fiscal years — LDOS led in 1 and OTEX in 16.
17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
LDOS's return on equity has been more volatile than OTEX's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 12.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.1.
17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between LDOS and OTEX over these 17 fiscal years — LDOS led in 12 and OTEX in 5.
17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.