Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / GPK VS KMB

GPK vs KMB

Graphic Packaging Holding Co. and Kimberly Clark Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

GPK vs KMB, at a glance
Metric GPK KMB
Revenue$8.6B$16.4B
Net income$444.0M$2.0B
Gross margin18.6%36.0%
Net margin5.2%12.5%
Return on equity14.0%172.6%
Diluted EPS$1.48$6.07
Dividend / share·$5.04
Payout ratio28.8%82.1%
Free cash flow·$1.6B
Equity$3.3B$1.5B
Net debt / equity1.58×4.31×
Current ratio1.30×0.75×
Revenue CAGR 5y5.6%−3.0%
Profit CAGR 5y21.6%−3.0%

KMB bills 1.9× the revenue of GPK, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (12.5% against 5.2%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

GPK vs KMB, revenue by year
Fiscal year GPK KMB
FY2025$8.6B$16.4B
FY2024$8.8B$16.8B
FY2023$9.4B$17.1B
FY2022$9.4B$20.2B
FY2021$7.2B$19.4B
FY2020$6.6B$19.1B
FY2019$6.2B$18.4B
FY2018$6.0B$18.5B
FY2017$4.4B$18.3B
FY2016$4.3B$18.3B
Net income by year

Bottom line

GPK vs KMB, net income by year
Fiscal year GPK KMB
FY2025$444.0M$2.0B
FY2024$658.0M$2.5B
FY2023$723.0M$1.8B
FY2022$522.0M$1.9B
FY2021$204.0M$1.8B
FY2020$167.0M$2.4B
FY2019$207.0M$2.2B
FY2018$221.1M$1.4B
FY2017$300.2M$2.3B
FY2016$228.0M$2.2B
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$7,830,000,000KMB
FY2024−$7,998,000,000KMB
FY2023−$7,718,000,000KMB
FY2022−$10,735,000,000KMB
FY2021−$12,284,000,000KMB
FY2020−$12,580,000,000KMB
FY2019−$12,290,000,000KMB
FY2018−$12,456,600,000KMB
FY2017−$13,942,400,000KMB
FY2016−$13,988,900,000KMB
FY2015−$14,430,800,000KMB
FY2014−$15,483,500,000KMB
FY2013−$15,082,900,000KMB
FY2012−$15,129,900,000KMB
FY2011−$16,639,700,000KMB
FY2010−$15,651,000,000KMB
FY2009−$15,019,200,000KMB

KMB has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−7.3 ppKMB
FY2024−7.9 ppKMB
FY2023−2.6 ppKMB
FY2022−4.2 ppKMB
FY2021−6.5 ppKMB
FY2020−9.4 ppKMB
FY2019−7.4 ppKMB
FY2018−2.9 ppKMB
FY2017−5.8 ppKMB
FY2016−6.8 ppKMB
FY2015−0.2 ppKMB
FY2014−6.0 ppKMB
FY2013−8.1 ppKMB
FY2012−6.6 ppKMB
FY2011−1.5 ppKMB
FY2010−9.6 ppKMB
FY2009−9.1 ppKMB

KMB has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 17 fiscal years.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

KMB's net margin has been more volatile than GPK's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 2.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.1.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

KMB led in net margin in every one of the 17 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

KMB's return on equity has been more volatile than GPK's over the 11 comparable fiscal years — 126.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 8.8.

11 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between GPK and KMB over these 11 fiscal years — GPK led in 1 and KMB in 10.

11 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages