Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / HPQ VS IBM

HPQ vs IBM

HP Inc. and International Business Machines Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

HPQ vs IBM, at a glance
Metric HPQ IBM
Revenue$55.3B$67.5B
Net income$2.5B$10.6B
Gross margin20.6%58.2%
Net margin4.6%15.7%
Return on equity·35.3%
Diluted EPS$2.65$11.17
Dividend / share$1.16$6.71
Payout ratio43.0%59.0%
Free cash flow$2.8B$12.1B
Equity$-346.0M$32.6B
Net debt / equity·1.46×
Current ratio0.77×0.96×
Revenue CAGR 5y−0.5%4.1%
Profit CAGR 5y−2.1%13.6%

IBM bills 1.2× the revenue of HPQ, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (15.7% against 4.6%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

HPQ vs IBM, revenue by year
Fiscal year HPQ IBM
FY2025$55.3B$67.5B
FY2024$53.6B$62.8B
FY2023$53.7B$61.9B
FY2022$62.9B$60.5B
FY2021$63.5B$57.4B
FY2020$56.6B$55.2B
FY2019$58.8B$57.7B
FY2018$58.5B$79.6B
FY2017$52.1B$79.1B
FY2016$48.2B$79.9B
Net income by year

Bottom line

HPQ vs IBM, net income by year
Fiscal year HPQ IBM
FY2025$2.5B$10.6B
FY2024$2.8B$6.0B
FY2023$3.3B$7.5B
FY2022$3.1B$1.6B
FY2021$6.5B$5.7B
FY2020$2.8B$5.6B
FY2019$3.2B$9.4B
FY2018$5.3B$8.7B
FY2017$2.5B$5.8B
FY2016$2.5B$11.9B
Revenue gap over time

19 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$12,240,000,000IBM
FY2024−$9,194,000,000IBM
FY2023−$8,142,000,000IBM
FY2022+$2,380,000,000HPQ
FY2021+$6,110,000,000HPQ
FY2020+$1,459,000,000HPQ
FY2019+$1,042,000,000HPQ
FY2018−$21,119,000,000IBM
FY2017−$27,083,000,000IBM
FY2016−$31,681,000,000IBM
FY2015−$30,278,000,000IBM
FY2014−$36,142,000,000IBM
FY2013+$13,931,000,000HPQ
FY2012+$17,483,000,000HPQ
FY2011+$20,329,000,000HPQ
FY2010+$26,163,000,000HPQ
FY2009+$18,794,000,000HPQ
FY2008+$14,734,000,000HPQ
FY2007+$5,500,000,000HPQ

The higher-revenue side has changed between HPQ and IBM over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

19 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−11.1 ppIBM
FY2024−4.4 ppIBM
FY2023−6.1 ppIBM
FY2022+2.3 ppHPQ
FY2021+0.3 ppHPQ
FY2020−5.2 ppIBM
FY2019−11.0 ppIBM
FY2018−1.9 ppIBM
FY2017−2.4 ppIBM
FY2016−9.7 ppIBM
FY2015−7.3 ppIBM
FY2014−4.1 ppIBM
FY2013−12.2 ppIBM
FY2012−26.7 ppIBM
FY2011−9.3 ppIBM
FY2010−7.9 ppIBM
FY2009−7.3 ppIBM
FY2008−4.9 ppIBM
FY2007−3.6 ppIBM

The higher net margin has changed hands between HPQ and IBM over this period.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

HPQ's net margin has been more volatile than IBM's over the 19 comparable fiscal years — 4.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.5.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between HPQ and IBM over these 19 fiscal years — HPQ led in 2 and IBM in 17.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

HPQ's return on equity has been more volatile than IBM's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 19.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 16.9.

9 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

IBM led in return on equity in every one of the 9 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

9 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages